American Foregut Society Cooperative White Paper on Mechanisms of Pathologic Reflux and Antireflux Surgery
Background: Within the spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), pathologic reflux applies to the subset of patients with either erosive esophagitis or abnormal esophageal acid exposure on pH-metry, consequences of a dysfunctional antireflux barrier (ARB). Methods: The American Foregut Society (AFS) tasked a 13-member working group of expert foregut surgeons and esophagologists (The ARB Cooperative) to develop a white paper on ARB function, dysfunction, and mechanisms of action of antireflux surgery through discussion of relevant literature summarized herein. Results: The ARB Cooperative concluded that pathologic reflux is a consequence of the interplay between progressive anatomical distortion of the ARB and physiology. Factors contributing to ARB dysfunction include (1) separation of crural diaphragm from the lower esophageal sphincter with widening of the hiatus and diminished crural diaphragm sphincteric function; (2) loss of the intra-abdominal lower esophageal sphincter segment with complete disabling of the flap valve component of the ARB; (3) axial hiatal hernia leading to reflux during swallow-induced lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, LES hypotension, inspiration related reflux, a lowered threshold for eliciting transient LES relaxations, and increased compliance of the gastroesophageal junction leading to greater diameter of sphincter opening during transient LES relaxations. With regard to antireflux surgery, the objectives include: (1) reduction of hiatal hernia and restoration of the intra-abdominal esophageal segment; (2) repair of the dilated hiatus; (3) restoring flap valve function by modifying gastroesophageal anatomy; and (4) restricting gastroesophageal junction opening during periods of relaxation. Conclusions: This ARB Cooperative white paper supports the concept of there being 3 major inter-related mechanisms promoting ARB competence: the LES as an intrinsic sphincter, the crural diaphragm as an extrinsic sphincter, and the gastroesophageal valve, a mechanical 1-way valve. Pathological reflux occurs with progressive anatomical disruption of the ARB which in turn leads to physiological dysfunction, the severity of which parallels the extent of anatomical disruption. The corollary of this is that the primary mechanism of antireflux surgery is to restore the ARB by eliminating or compensating for its anatomical disruption. It is the hope of the cooperative that understanding the proposed framework will help clinicians and researchers in improving antireflux procedures.
Authors
- Reginald C. W. Bell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7912-4000)
- Nirav C Thosani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4607-6241)
- Rena H. Yadlapati (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-2033)
- John C. Lipham (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6203-5263)
- Vitor Brunaldi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3315-8640)
- Ninh T. Nguyen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3134-1225)
- Barham Abu Dayyeh
- Marcelo W. Hinojosa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9930-3161)
- Christy M. Dunst (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8320-5428)
- Kenneth J. Chang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9897-277X)
- Brant K. Oelschlager (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2231-5575)
- Peter J. Kahrilas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8260-1250)
- P.F. Buckley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7470-6610)
- Ravinder K. Mittal
Institutions
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- University of California, Irvine Medical Center (US)
- Oregon Clinic (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Foregut The Journal of the American Foregut Society
- Published
- 2024-09-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161241276454
- Citations
- 12
- Primary Topic
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.57