Constitutional Values and Freedom of Contract

Abstract The balancing of freedom of contract against fundamental values seems to be a classic subject. It is commonly taught in contract law that fundamental principles may constitute a limit on freedom of contract, and justify infringement of the freedom of choice of the contracting party or, above all, of the freedom to determine the content of the contract. There are indeed a number of values that may justify infringement: the protection of the weaker party, but also other more contemporary issues such as environmental protection. It therefore appears that the heart of freedom of contract, the only intangible value that must be constitutionally protected, is the freedom to enter into or not to enter into a contract. In our view, however, the subject should also be taken in the other direction: certain fundamental values must in fact be protected because they are the very conditions under which freedom of contract is possible. In other words, certain limits on freedom of contract serve not only to protect fundamental values but also to protect freedom of contract itself. To forget this could lead to a reversal of that freedom and thus to a collapse of the legal framework necessary for the protection of constitutional values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Review of Contract Law
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2024-2009
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constitutional Values and Freedom of Contract

Muriel Fabre-Magnan
European Review of Contract Law
Legal principles and applications
article

Constitutional Values and Freedom of Contract

Muriel Fabre-Magnan
article en

Abstract

Abstract The balancing of freedom of contract against fundamental values seems to be a classic subject. It is commonly taught in contract law that fundamental principles may constitute a limit on freedom of contract, and justify infringement of the freedom of choice of the contracting party or, above all, of the freedom to determine the content of the contract. There are indeed a number of values that may justify infringement: the protection of the weaker party, but also other more contemporary issues such as environmental protection. It therefore appears that the heart of freedom of contract, the only intangible value that must be constitutionally protected, is the freedom to enter into or not to enter into a contract. In our view, however, the subject should also be taken in the other direction: certain fundamental values must in fact be protected because they are the very conditions under which freedom of contract is possible. In other words, certain limits on freedom of contract serve not only to protect fundamental values but also to protect freedom of contract itself. To forget this could lead to a reversal of that freedom and thus to a collapse of the legal framework necessary for the protection of constitutional values.

European Review of Contract LawVol. 20(3)
Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Legal principles and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.