Provincial-scale assessment of direct air capture to meet China’s climate neutrality goal under limited bioenergy supply

Abstract China has large, estimated potential for direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS) but its deployment locations and impacts at the subnational scale remain unclear. This is largely because higher spatial resolution studies on carbon dioxide removal (CDR) in China have focused mainly on bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. This study uses a spatially detailed integrated energy-economy-climate model to evaluate DACCS for 31 provinces in China as the country pursues its goal of climate neutrality by 2060. We find that DACCS could expand China’s negative emissions capacity, particularly under sustainability-minded limits on bioenergy supply that are informed by bottom-up studies. But providing low-carbon electricity for multiple GtCO 2 yr −1 DACCS may require over 600 GW of additional wind and solar capacity nationwide and comprise up to 30% of electricity demand in China’s northern provinces. Investment requirements for DACCS range from $330 to $530 billion by 2060 but could be repaid manyfold in the form of avoided mitigation costs, which DACCS deployment could reduce by up to $6 trillion over the same period. Enhanced efforts to lower residual CO 2 emissions that must be offset with CDR under a net-zero paradigm reduce but do not eliminate the use of DACCS for mitigation. For decision-makers and the energy-economy models guiding them, our results highlight the value of expanding beyond the current reliance on biomass for negative emissions in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2024-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad77e7
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Provincial-scale assessment of direct air capture to meet China’s climate neutrality goal under limited bioenergy supply

Ryna Cui, Andrés F. Clarens, Jay Fuhrman, Hanwoong Kim et al.
5 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
1.06
article

Provincial-scale assessment of direct air capture to meet China’s climate neutrality goal under limited bioenergy supply

Ryna Cui, Andrés F. Clarens, Jay Fuhrman, Hanwoong Kim, Parisa Javadi, Sha Yu, Hanying Jiang, Yang Ou, Haewon McJeon, Yang Qiu, Andy Miller, Jenna Behrendt, Jiachen Wang, Can Wang, Rui Wang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract China has large, estimated potential for direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS) but its deployment locations and impacts at the subnational scale remain unclear. This is largely because higher spatial resolution studies on carbon dioxide removal (CDR) in China have focused mainly on bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. This study uses a spatially detailed integrated energy-economy-climate model to evaluate DACCS for 31 provinces in China as the country pursues its goal of climate neutrality by 2060. We find that DACCS could expand China’s negative emissions capacity, particularly under sustainability-minded limits on bioenergy supply that are informed by bottom-up studies. But providing low-carbon electricity for multiple GtCO 2 yr −1 DACCS may require over 600 GW of additional wind and solar capacity nationwide and comprise up to 30% of electricity demand in China’s northern provinces. Investment requirements for DACCS range from $330 to $530 billion by 2060 but could be repaid manyfold in the form of avoided mitigation costs, which DACCS deployment could reduce by up to $6 trillion over the same period. Enhanced efforts to lower residual CO 2 emissions that must be offset with CDR under a net-zero paradigm reduce but do not eliminate the use of DACCS for mitigation. For decision-makers and the energy-economy models guiding them, our results highlight the value of expanding beyond the current reliance on biomass for negative emissions in China.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 19(11)
Joint Global Change Research Institute (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR), Peking University (CN), University of Virginia (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Science Foundation, ClimateWorks Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.