Cost-effective strategy of treating chromite ore processing residue (COPR); production of chromate, subsequent detoxification and in-situ stabilization

It is a great importance of finding the cost-effective strategy of treating chromite ore processing residue (COPR). Cr(Ⅵ), presented in aqueous media, could easily be reduced, adsorption and removed from water body through a proper treatment, but Cr(Ⅵ), incorporated in COPR, could not, due to its characteristic inherent to COPR. In general, the reduction and adsorption of Cr(Ⅵ) could take place at a low pH, the COPR, however, has a high acid neutralizing capacity, so that a great deal of the inorganic acid would be required to maintain its pH at low value. In this work, a series of treatment trials, comprised of the production of chromate from COPR by leaching process, the subsequent detoxification and in-situ stabilisation of post-leached COPR (plCOPR) were conducted. After column extracting process using the seawater, Cr(Ⅵ)-containing leachate of 600~800 mg/L is led to the ion exchange columns, charged with the anion exchange resin, to adsorb the Cr(Ⅵ) until the effluent contains Cr(Ⅵ) of 5 mg/L. The Cr(Ⅵ) loaded ion exchange column was eluted by NaOH solution and the maximum concentration of Cr(Ⅵ) in the elution was 43.1 g/L. Afterward, plCOPR was mixed with sodium sulfide and iron sulfide+lime as a reductant and a stabiliser, respectively, and the mixture was discharged directly from the mixer and piled on a certain area. After 360 d of curing, Cr(VI) concentration in the leachate from the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) was arrived at 1.2 mg/L, below the regulatory limit disposal standard (HJ/T 301-2007, 3 mg/L).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Resources Conservation and Research
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24294/nrcr.v7i2.6593
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effective strategy of treating chromite ore processing residue (COPR); production of chromate, subsequent detoxification and in-situ stabilization

Yongnam Kim, Myongchol Ryu, Hui-Won Kim, Yong-Gun Han
1 citations
Natural Resources Conservation and Research
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
0.18
article

Cost-effective strategy of treating chromite ore processing residue (COPR); production of chromate, subsequent detoxification and in-situ stabilization

Yongnam Kim, Myongchol Ryu, Hui-Won Kim, Yong-Gun Han
article en
1 citations

Abstract

It is a great importance of finding the cost-effective strategy of treating chromite ore processing residue (COPR). Cr(Ⅵ), presented in aqueous media, could easily be reduced, adsorption and removed from water body through a proper treatment, but Cr(Ⅵ), incorporated in COPR, could not, due to its characteristic inherent to COPR. In general, the reduction and adsorption of Cr(Ⅵ) could take place at a low pH, the COPR, however, has a high acid neutralizing capacity, so that a great deal of the inorganic acid would be required to maintain its pH at low value. In this work, a series of treatment trials, comprised of the production of chromate from COPR by leaching process, the subsequent detoxification and in-situ stabilisation of post-leached COPR (plCOPR) were conducted. After column extracting process using the seawater, Cr(Ⅵ)-containing leachate of 600~800 mg/L is led to the ion exchange columns, charged with the anion exchange resin, to adsorb the Cr(Ⅵ) until the effluent contains Cr(Ⅵ) of 5 mg/L. The Cr(Ⅵ) loaded ion exchange column was eluted by NaOH solution and the maximum concentration of Cr(Ⅵ) in the elution was 43.1 g/L. Afterward, plCOPR was mixed with sodium sulfide and iron sulfide+lime as a reductant and a stabiliser, respectively, and the mixture was discharged directly from the mixer and piled on a certain area. After 360 d of curing, Cr(VI) concentration in the leachate from the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) was arrived at 1.2 mg/L, below the regulatory limit disposal standard (HJ/T 301-2007, 3 mg/L).

Natural Resources Conservation and ResearchVol. 7(2)
Moscow Architectural Institute (RU), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.