Exploring occupational participation and engagement during disaster through the lens of the Participatory Occupational Justice Framework

Introduction: When communities affected by disaster are denied the physical, social, economic, or cultural resources or opportunities for engaging in necessary or meaningful occupation, the impact of disasters can be considered as a form of occupational injustice, predicating a corresponding focus on the restoration of occupational justice in disaster response and recovery. Method: This study aimed to explore occupational participation and engagement during disaster and into recovery around Australia in the period 2019-2022 through a secondary analysis of purposively selected narratives from the recent publication Doing Our Best: Individual and Community Responses to Challenging Times (Occupational Therapy Australia (OTAustralia), 2022). Drawing on a critical realist ontology, this analysis utilised the Participatory Occupational Justice Framework (POJF) as a conceptual frame to explore narratives on the experiences of Australians during droughts, bushfires, floods, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings: Findings highlighted an array of collaborative enabling processes intuitively enacted by participants in response to the occupational injustices experienced in disaster events. Findings illuminated the benefits that arose from community-driven action, suggesting participation in emancipatory action to restore occupational justice had transformative potential. Narratives illustrated the wider contextual drivers at local, national, and international levels which supported occupational participation and engagement, suggesting high levels of social capital could act as a key protective factor. Conclusion: The analysis of narratives highlighted the importance of occupation during disaster and into recovery. Interpreting narratives through the POJF deepened understandings of occupational participation and engagement from a justice perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational Science
Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2024.2394158
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring occupational participation and engagement during disaster through the lens of the Participatory Occupational Justice Framework

Gail Whiteford, Emma George, Alison Wicks, Eliza Huppatz
2 citations
Journal of Occupational Science
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
3.43
article

Exploring occupational participation and engagement during disaster through the lens of the Participatory Occupational Justice Framework

Gail Whiteford, Emma George, Alison Wicks, Eliza Huppatz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: When communities affected by disaster are denied the physical, social, economic, or cultural resources or opportunities for engaging in necessary or meaningful occupation, the impact of disasters can be considered as a form of occupational injustice, predicating a corresponding focus on the restoration of occupational justice in disaster response and recovery. Method: This study aimed to explore occupational participation and engagement during disaster and into recovery around Australia in the period 2019-2022 through a secondary analysis of purposively selected narratives from the recent publication Doing Our Best: Individual and Community Responses to Challenging Times (Occupational Therapy Australia (OTAustralia), 2022). Drawing on a critical realist ontology, this analysis utilised the Participatory Occupational Justice Framework (POJF) as a conceptual frame to explore narratives on the experiences of Australians during droughts, bushfires, floods, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings: Findings highlighted an array of collaborative enabling processes intuitively enacted by participants in response to the occupational injustices experienced in disaster events. Findings illuminated the benefits that arose from community-driven action, suggesting participation in emancipatory action to restore occupational justice had transformative potential. Narratives illustrated the wider contextual drivers at local, national, and international levels which supported occupational participation and engagement, suggesting high levels of social capital could act as a key protective factor. Conclusion: The analysis of narratives highlighted the importance of occupation during disaster and into recovery. Interpreting narratives through the POJF deepened understandings of occupational participation and engagement from a justice perspective.

Journal of Occupational ScienceVol. 32(1)
Charles Sturt University (AU), University of Canberra (AU), ACT Government (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.