Tool wear evaluation of self-propelled rotary tool and conventional round tool during turning Inconel 718

Enhancing the machinability of difficult-to-cut materials is imperative, and a non-conventional rotary tool has shown high potential when machining these materials. This work comparatively evaluates the tool wear of conventional round tools (CRTs) and self-propelled rotary tools (SPRTs) when turning Inconel 718. Tool wear progression over time was measured and analyzed, simulated for various cutting conditions by creating mathematical and ANN models. This study found a 67% increase in tool life for SPRTs over CRTs, especially at a higher cutting speed of 65 m/min, due to improved heat transmission and steady wear distribution. However, at lower cutting conditions, the tool life gain was 15–18%, indicating that SPRTs could be reliably used at higher cutting conditions to achieve a machining economy. SPRTs exhibited better chip control and reduced built-up edge formation than CRTs. The cutting speed had the largest impact on tool flank wear, with machining time, feed, and depth of cut following closely behind. However, this effect was more prominent for CRTs. The 0.2 mm tool wear criterion was found to be more feasible since tool failure was caused by cutting tool chipping at this threshold instead of progressive growth of flank wear during Inconel 718 turning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3221/igf-esis.70.14
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tool wear evaluation of self-propelled rotary tool and conventional round tool during turning Inconel 718

Nitin Motgi, Satish Chinchanikar
1 citations
Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale
Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
0.12
article

Tool wear evaluation of self-propelled rotary tool and conventional round tool during turning Inconel 718

Nitin Motgi, Satish Chinchanikar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Enhancing the machinability of difficult-to-cut materials is imperative, and a non-conventional rotary tool has shown high potential when machining these materials. This work comparatively evaluates the tool wear of conventional round tools (CRTs) and self-propelled rotary tools (SPRTs) when turning Inconel 718. Tool wear progression over time was measured and analyzed, simulated for various cutting conditions by creating mathematical and ANN models. This study found a 67% increase in tool life for SPRTs over CRTs, especially at a higher cutting speed of 65 m/min, due to improved heat transmission and steady wear distribution. However, at lower cutting conditions, the tool life gain was 15–18%, indicating that SPRTs could be reliably used at higher cutting conditions to achieve a machining economy. SPRTs exhibited better chip control and reduced built-up edge formation than CRTs. The cutting speed had the largest impact on tool flank wear, with machining time, feed, and depth of cut following closely behind. However, this effect was more prominent for CRTs. The 0.2 mm tool wear criterion was found to be more feasible since tool failure was caused by cutting tool chipping at this threshold instead of progressive growth of flank wear during Inconel 718 turning.

Frattura ed Integrità StrutturaleVol. 18(70)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
0.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tool wear evaluation of self-propelled rotary tool and conventional round tool during turning Inconel 718 — Nitin Motgi, Satish Chinchanikar · Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS