MENYELARASKAN KEPENTINGAN POLITIK, BUDAYA, DAN BIROKRASI DALAM PERUMUSAN KEBIJAKAN PERTAHANAN

This research investigates the multifaceted challenges of defense policy formulation by addressing three primary questions: How does political polarization affect defense policy? In what ways do cultural factors influence national defense policies? What are the primary bureaucratic obstacles in defense policy formulation, and how can they be mitigated? Utilizing Political Polarization Theory, the study examines how ideological divides hinder consensus-building and lead to policy stagnation. Constructivist Theory of International Relations explores how cultural narratives, historical legacies, and national identity shape defense strategies. The Bureaucratic Politics Model analyzes internal power struggles and inter-agency rivalries that complicate policy formulation. Qualitative research methods using secondary data, including literature reviews, policy documents, and case studies, are employed to examine these dynamics. Findings indicate that political polarization leads to delayed and compromised defense policies, cultural factors significantly influence strategic priorities, and bureaucratic obstacles impede efficient policy implementation. The study concludes with recommendations for mitigating these obstacles through strategic reforms, enhanced inter-agency coordination, and the adoption of new technologies. This research provides comprehensive insights for policymakers to navigate the complexities of defense policy formulation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Governance
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33558/governance.v12i2.9552
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MENYELARASKAN KEPENTINGAN POLITIK, BUDAYA, DAN BIROKRASI DALAM PERUMUSAN KEBIJAKAN PERTAHANAN

Aris Sarjito
Governance
Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
article

MENYELARASKAN KEPENTINGAN POLITIK, BUDAYA, DAN BIROKRASI DALAM PERUMUSAN KEBIJAKAN PERTAHANAN

Aris Sarjito
article en

Abstract

This research investigates the multifaceted challenges of defense policy formulation by addressing three primary questions: How does political polarization affect defense policy? In what ways do cultural factors influence national defense policies? What are the primary bureaucratic obstacles in defense policy formulation, and how can they be mitigated? Utilizing Political Polarization Theory, the study examines how ideological divides hinder consensus-building and lead to policy stagnation. Constructivist Theory of International Relations explores how cultural narratives, historical legacies, and national identity shape defense strategies. The Bureaucratic Politics Model analyzes internal power struggles and inter-agency rivalries that complicate policy formulation. Qualitative research methods using secondary data, including literature reviews, policy documents, and case studies, are employed to examine these dynamics. Findings indicate that political polarization leads to delayed and compromised defense policies, cultural factors significantly influence strategic priorities, and bureaucratic obstacles impede efficient policy implementation. The study concludes with recommendations for mitigating these obstacles through strategic reforms, enhanced inter-agency coordination, and the adoption of new technologies. This research provides comprehensive insights for policymakers to navigate the complexities of defense policy formulation.

GovernanceVol. 12(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.