How Republics Die: Plutarch and the Intra-elite Rivalries that Destroyed the Roman Commonwealth

Plutarch's Roman Lives present an unusual, if historically compelling, account of why the Roman Republic collapsed. Drawing on Polybius' political theory (sketched out in Histories 6.57), Plutarch suggests that after the fall of Carthage, traditional competition among elites began to spiral out of control. Not only did competition lead to increasingly violent clashes over scarce honours, it exacerbated the tensions between social classes, which the elites played off each other for personal gain. As the stakes of these rivalries increased, so too did the temptation to ignore or undo customary norms, especially for limits on executive offices. Intra-elite rivalry was doubly destructive: it led to the dismantling of the constitution and unleashed civil violence, and ultimately revolution. The political lesson that Plutarch provides is that elite rivalry must be skilfully managed in order to avoid winner-takes-all and oneupmanship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Political Thought
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53765/20512988.45.3.401
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philippine History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Republics Die: Plutarch and the Intra-elite Rivalries that Destroyed the Roman Commonwealth

Dan Edelstein
1 citations
History of Political Thought
Philippine History and Culture
3.72
article

How Republics Die: Plutarch and the Intra-elite Rivalries that Destroyed the Roman Commonwealth

Dan Edelstein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Plutarch's Roman Lives present an unusual, if historically compelling, account of why the Roman Republic collapsed. Drawing on Polybius' political theory (sketched out in Histories 6.57), Plutarch suggests that after the fall of Carthage, traditional competition among elites began to spiral out of control. Not only did competition lead to increasingly violent clashes over scarce honours, it exacerbated the tensions between social classes, which the elites played off each other for personal gain. As the stakes of these rivalries increased, so too did the temptation to ignore or undo customary norms, especially for limits on executive offices. Intra-elite rivalry was doubly destructive: it led to the dismantling of the constitution and unleashed civil violence, and ultimately revolution. The political lesson that Plutarch provides is that elite rivalry must be skilfully managed in order to avoid winner-takes-all and oneupmanship.

History of Political ThoughtVol. 45(3)
Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Philippine History and Culture
3.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.