James Harrington and the English Agrarian Law

It is typically understood that the first explicit advocacy of agrarian laws in early modern English political thought was made by James Harrington in the 1650s. This narrative, however, has overlooked the Tudor Statutes of Tillage (originating 1489–90), which aimed at maintaining a broad distribution of landholding and were identified by both sixteenth- and seventeenth-century observers as agrarian laws. Having demonstrated this, a discourse concerning agrarian laws can be identified, which consequently contextualizes and explicates Harrington's redefinition of agrarian laws. Understanding the nature of Harrington's contribution further allows a reassessment of his immediate reception.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Political Thought
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53765/20512988.45.3.485
Primary Topic
Historical Economic and Legal Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

James Harrington and the English Agrarian Law

Mishael Knight
History of Political Thought
Historical Economic and Legal Thought
article

James Harrington and the English Agrarian Law

Mishael Knight
article en

Abstract

It is typically understood that the first explicit advocacy of agrarian laws in early modern English political thought was made by James Harrington in the 1650s. This narrative, however, has overlooked the Tudor Statutes of Tillage (originating 1489–90), which aimed at maintaining a broad distribution of landholding and were identified by both sixteenth- and seventeenth-century observers as agrarian laws. Having demonstrated this, a discourse concerning agrarian laws can be identified, which consequently contextualizes and explicates Harrington's redefinition of agrarian laws. Understanding the nature of Harrington's contribution further allows a reassessment of his immediate reception.

History of Political ThoughtVol. 45(3)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Historical Economic and Legal Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.