Ethics in focus: PhD students’ perspectives on IRBs in India

Purpose This study aims to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of PhD students in India regarding research ethics and institutional review boards (IRBs), assess awareness levels, identify training gaps, examine ethical priorities and understand challenges in the IRB application process. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative approach was used, and a self-evaluator questionnaire was distributed electronically to PhD students. Data collection occurred between 1 March 1 and 30 March 2024, with analysis conducted using SPSS software. Findings The study reveals a significant gap in formal training on IRB procedures within PhD programs and challenges in completing IRB applications despite recognising ethical priorities such as informed consent and confidentiality. Originality/value This study provides insights into PhD students’ perspectives on research ethics and IRBs in India, highlighting the need for enhanced education and awareness initiatives to promote responsible conduct and safeguard research participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-04-2024-0234
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethics in focus: PhD students’ perspectives on IRBs in India

Naved Ahmad, Manoj Kumar Verma, Mohammed Gulzar Ahmed, A Subaveerapandiyan et al.
1 citations
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
article

Ethics in focus: PhD students’ perspectives on IRBs in India

Naved Ahmad, Manoj Kumar Verma, Mohammed Gulzar Ahmed, A Subaveerapandiyan, Amreen Taj
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of PhD students in India regarding research ethics and institutional review boards (IRBs), assess awareness levels, identify training gaps, examine ethical priorities and understand challenges in the IRB application process. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative approach was used, and a self-evaluator questionnaire was distributed electronically to PhD students. Data collection occurred between 1 March 1 and 30 March 2024, with analysis conducted using SPSS software. Findings The study reveals a significant gap in formal training on IRB procedures within PhD programs and challenges in completing IRB applications despite recognising ethical priorities such as informed consent and confidentiality. Originality/value This study provides insights into PhD students’ perspectives on research ethics and IRBs in India, highlighting the need for enhanced education and awareness initiatives to promote responsible conduct and safeguard research participants.

Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Alfaisal University (SA), Yenepoya University (IN), Mizoram University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethics in focus: PhD students’ perspectives on IRBs in India — Naved Ahmad, Manoj Kumar Verma, et al. · Global Knowledge Memory and Communication (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS