Comparison of Different Intraoral Scanners With Prefabricated Aid on Accuracy and Framework Passive Fit of Digital Complete‐Arch Implant Impression: An In Vitro Study

With the prefabricated aids, the accuracy of IOSs enhanced significantly in digital complete-arch implant impressions. Three IOSs showed different levels of improvement in accuracy. Virtual RMS errors <62.2 μm could be the clinically acceptable threshold (150 μm) for framework passive fit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14353
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Different Intraoral Scanners With Prefabricated Aid on Accuracy and Framework Passive Fit of Digital Complete‐Arch Implant Impression: An In Vitro Study

M Q Liu, Hongchang Lai, Ke Deng, X J Fu et al.
7 citations
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
3.45
article

Comparison of Different Intraoral Scanners With Prefabricated Aid on Accuracy and Framework Passive Fit of Digital Complete‐Arch Implant Impression: An In Vitro Study

M Q Liu, Hongchang Lai, Ke Deng, X J Fu, Xiaomeng Zhang, Wen Gu, Junyu Shi
article en
7 citations

Abstract

With the prefabricated aids, the accuracy of IOSs enhanced significantly in digital complete-arch implant impressions. Three IOSs showed different levels of improvement in accuracy. Virtual RMS errors <62.2 μm could be the clinically acceptable threshold (150 μm) for framework passive fit.

Clinical Oral Implants ResearchVol. 36(1)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
3.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.