Analyzing the Right to Abortion through the Principle of Proportionality: Focusing on the European Court of Human Rights’ analysis of M.L. v. Poland(2023)

The right to abortion remains a controversial issue and a subject of cultural and religious challenges and conflicts to universal human rights. Within the European Union (EU), this right is affected by a variety of factors. National laws, cultural norms, and political ideologies shape the lively debate, which is the basis for the existence of various laws and regulations within the EU. At the center of this debate is the discussion of women's rights and reproductive autonomy. The fight for abortion rights is primarily about asserting the right to take responsibility for one's own bodily integrity and reproductive decisions. This includes access to legal and safe abortion services. However, the legal conditions for this vary greatly across the member states of the European Union. This paper examines the debate surrounding the right to abortion through the lens of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case M.L. v. Poland (2023) and addresses the question of discrimination under Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which is at the center of the case. In particular, it examines how the right to abortion can be reconciled with the principle of proportionality. The debate on abortion rights in the European Union is multi-layered and has social, legal, and political implications. First of all, abortion rights are a human rights issue. Reproductive autonomy and a woman's right to self-determination are fundamental human rights enshrined in international conventions and the European Convention on Human Rights. The M.L. v. Poland case addresses the issues that arise when national laws and cultural norms conflict with European and international human rights standards. The proportionality test for abortion rights involves basic ethical questions about life, autonomy, and societal moral obligations to individuals. Research addressing this question will contribute to a deeper understanding of the complex interconnections of the issues surrounding the right to abortion and to identifying possible ways in which the European Union and individual Member States can find harmonious and just solutions to the right to abortion.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38133/cnulawreview.2024.44.3.373
Primary Topic
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing the Right to Abortion through the Principle of Proportionality: Focusing on the European Court of Human Rights’ analysis of M.L. v. Poland(2023)

Hyungjoon Jun, Hyun Jung Lee
Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
article

Analyzing the Right to Abortion through the Principle of Proportionality: Focusing on the European Court of Human Rights’ analysis of M.L. v. Poland(2023)

Hyungjoon Jun, Hyun Jung Lee
article en

Abstract

The right to abortion remains a controversial issue and a subject of cultural and religious challenges and conflicts to universal human rights. Within the European Union (EU), this right is affected by a variety of factors. National laws, cultural norms, and political ideologies shape the lively debate, which is the basis for the existence of various laws and regulations within the EU. At the center of this debate is the discussion of women's rights and reproductive autonomy. The fight for abortion rights is primarily about asserting the right to take responsibility for one's own bodily integrity and reproductive decisions. This includes access to legal and safe abortion services. However, the legal conditions for this vary greatly across the member states of the European Union. This paper examines the debate surrounding the right to abortion through the lens of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case M.L. v. Poland (2023) and addresses the question of discrimination under Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which is at the center of the case. In particular, it examines how the right to abortion can be reconciled with the principle of proportionality. The debate on abortion rights in the European Union is multi-layered and has social, legal, and political implications. First of all, abortion rights are a human rights issue. Reproductive autonomy and a woman's right to self-determination are fundamental human rights enshrined in international conventions and the European Convention on Human Rights. The M.L. v. Poland case addresses the issues that arise when national laws and cultural norms conflict with European and international human rights standards. The proportionality test for abortion rights involves basic ethical questions about life, autonomy, and societal moral obligations to individuals. Research addressing this question will contribute to a deeper understanding of the complex interconnections of the issues surrounding the right to abortion and to identifying possible ways in which the European Union and individual Member States can find harmonious and just solutions to the right to abortion.

Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National UniversityVol. 44(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.