Environmental impact comparison of conventional drilling techniques versus advanced characterization methods

This paper presents a comprehensive environmental impact comparison between conventional drilling techniques and advanced characterization methods in the extraction of subsurface resources. Conventional drilling, while widely used, often results in significant environmental disturbances, including habitat destruction, groundwater contamination, and increased greenhouse gas emissions. Advanced characterization methods, such as seismic imaging, magnetic resonance, and electromagnetic surveys, offer the potential to minimize these impacts by providing precise subsurface information that enhances drilling accuracy and efficiency. This paper provides an in-depth environmental impact comparison between conventional drilling techniques and advanced characterization methods used in subsurface resource extraction. Conventional drilling, characterized by its extensive physical footprint and high resource consumption, is associated with various environmental challenges, such as habitat disruption, groundwater contamination, air pollution, and substantial greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, advanced characterization methods, including seismic imaging, magnetic resonance, and electromagnetic surveys, offer a less invasive approach, enabling more accurate targeting of drilling sites and thereby reducing the need for extensive exploratory drilling Through a systematic analysis, this paper examines the lifecycle environmental impacts of both conventional and advanced methods, focusing on key metrics such as carbon footprint, water usage, land disturbance, and ecological impact. The results demonstrate that advanced characterization methods significantly mitigate environmental impacts by enhancing drilling precision and reducing unnecessary drilling activities. For instance, improved subsurface imaging and data interpretation lead to fewer dry wells and reduced exploratory drilling, thereby lowering overall environmental degradation. Furthermore, the integration of advanced characterization technologies into drilling operations is shown to support better decision-making processes, optimize resource extraction, and promote sustainable development. These methods contribute to minimizing waste, improving energy efficiency, and enhancing the safety of drilling operations. The findings of this study advocate for the widespread adoption of advanced characterization methods in the oil and gas industry as a strategy to achieve more sustainable and environmentally responsible resource extraction practices. Keywords: Environmental Impact, Sustainability, Resource, Extraction, Subsurface, Drilling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Science & Technology Journal
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i9.1548
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental impact comparison of conventional drilling techniques versus advanced characterization methods

Bolarinwa Solanke, Obinna Joshua Ochulor, Henry Oziegbe Iriogbe, Femi Bamidele Onita
4 citations
Engineering Science & Technology Journal
Drilling and Well Engineering
1.34
article

Environmental impact comparison of conventional drilling techniques versus advanced characterization methods

Bolarinwa Solanke, Obinna Joshua Ochulor, Henry Oziegbe Iriogbe, Femi Bamidele Onita
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive environmental impact comparison between conventional drilling techniques and advanced characterization methods in the extraction of subsurface resources. Conventional drilling, while widely used, often results in significant environmental disturbances, including habitat destruction, groundwater contamination, and increased greenhouse gas emissions. Advanced characterization methods, such as seismic imaging, magnetic resonance, and electromagnetic surveys, offer the potential to minimize these impacts by providing precise subsurface information that enhances drilling accuracy and efficiency. This paper provides an in-depth environmental impact comparison between conventional drilling techniques and advanced characterization methods used in subsurface resource extraction. Conventional drilling, characterized by its extensive physical footprint and high resource consumption, is associated with various environmental challenges, such as habitat disruption, groundwater contamination, air pollution, and substantial greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, advanced characterization methods, including seismic imaging, magnetic resonance, and electromagnetic surveys, offer a less invasive approach, enabling more accurate targeting of drilling sites and thereby reducing the need for extensive exploratory drilling Through a systematic analysis, this paper examines the lifecycle environmental impacts of both conventional and advanced methods, focusing on key metrics such as carbon footprint, water usage, land disturbance, and ecological impact. The results demonstrate that advanced characterization methods significantly mitigate environmental impacts by enhancing drilling precision and reducing unnecessary drilling activities. For instance, improved subsurface imaging and data interpretation lead to fewer dry wells and reduced exploratory drilling, thereby lowering overall environmental degradation. Furthermore, the integration of advanced characterization technologies into drilling operations is shown to support better decision-making processes, optimize resource extraction, and promote sustainable development. These methods contribute to minimizing waste, improving energy efficiency, and enhancing the safety of drilling operations. The findings of this study advocate for the widespread adoption of advanced characterization methods in the oil and gas industry as a strategy to achieve more sustainable and environmentally responsible resource extraction practices. Keywords: Environmental Impact, Sustainability, Resource, Extraction, Subsurface, Drilling.

Engineering Science & Technology JournalVol. 5(9)
Shell (United States) (US), Federal University of Petroleum Resource Effurun (NG)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Drilling and Well Engineering
1.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.