Evaluating guideline and registration policies among neurology journals: a cross-sectional analysis
While many top neurology journals endorse the use of RGs and trial registries, there are still areas where their adoption can be improved. Addressing these shortcomings leads to further advancements in the field of neurology, resulting in higher-quality research and better outcomes for patients.
Authors
- Zachary Ernst
- Danya Nees (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9882-415X)
- Caleb Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8270-3938)
- Andrew V. Tran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3855-1353)
- Matt Vassar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2859-6152)
- Griffin Hughes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3863-7915)
- John K. Stadler
Institutions
- Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Neurology
- Published
- 2024-09-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03839-1
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.92