A Critical Appraisal on China's Blocking Statutes from a Private Actor's Perspective

This article examines the potential repercussions of China's blocking statutes on private actors. In recent years, China's strategy for countering unilateral sanctions has evolved from mere diplomatic protests to utilizing a legal toolkit, most notably through the promulgation of three blocking statutes between 2019 and 2021. This article argues that while a primary goal of China's blocking statutes is to protect the interests of private actors, this objective remains only partially fulfilled. Rather, the enforcement of these statutes may inadvertently precipitate additional challenges for private parties, such as heightened legal uncertainty, risk of exposure to conflicting legal obligations, and increased complexity in private dispute resolution. Given these predicaments, the article advocates that Chinese authorities give due consideration to the interests of private actors in the enforcement of blocking statutes. Specifically, it is recommended that Chinese authorities adopt a prudent enforcement approach and concurrently enhance the procedural support mechanisms for these statutes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Journal of Transnational Law
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2753412x241270492
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critical Appraisal on China's Blocking Statutes from a Private Actor's Perspective

Guiqiang Liu
Chinese Journal of Transnational Law
International Law and Human Rights
article

A Critical Appraisal on China's Blocking Statutes from a Private Actor's Perspective

Guiqiang Liu
article en

Abstract

This article examines the potential repercussions of China's blocking statutes on private actors. In recent years, China's strategy for countering unilateral sanctions has evolved from mere diplomatic protests to utilizing a legal toolkit, most notably through the promulgation of three blocking statutes between 2019 and 2021. This article argues that while a primary goal of China's blocking statutes is to protect the interests of private actors, this objective remains only partially fulfilled. Rather, the enforcement of these statutes may inadvertently precipitate additional challenges for private parties, such as heightened legal uncertainty, risk of exposure to conflicting legal obligations, and increased complexity in private dispute resolution. Given these predicaments, the article advocates that Chinese authorities give due consideration to the interests of private actors in the enforcement of blocking statutes. Specifically, it is recommended that Chinese authorities adopt a prudent enforcement approach and concurrently enhance the procedural support mechanisms for these statutes.

Chinese Journal of Transnational LawVol. 1(2)
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.