Situating AI in assessment—an exploration of university teachers’ valuing practices

Abstract Emerging AI technologies are changing teachers’ assessment practices and posing higher education institutions with novel ethical dilemmas. While frameworks and guidelines promise to align technology with moral and human values, the dilemma of how AI may impact existing valuing practices is often overlooked. To examine this gap, we conducted an interview study with university teachers from different disciplines at a university in Sweden. Following a semi-structured study design, we explored university teachers’ anticipations of AI in assessment and examined how emerging AI technologies may reconfigure the fit between values, challenges, and activities situated in everyday assessment contexts. Our findings suggest that anticipated AI, including automation and AI-mediated communication and grading, may amplify and reduce teachers’ possibilities to align activities with professional, pedagogical, and relational values and solve current challenges. In light of the study’s findings, the paper discusses potential ethical issues in the anticipated shifts from human to automated assessment and possible new and reinforced challenges brought by AI for education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00558-8
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Situating AI in assessment—an exploration of university teachers’ valuing practices

Elin Sporrong, Teresa Cerratto Pargman, Cormac McGrath
8 citations
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.21
article

Situating AI in assessment—an exploration of university teachers’ valuing practices

Elin Sporrong, Teresa Cerratto Pargman, Cormac McGrath
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Emerging AI technologies are changing teachers’ assessment practices and posing higher education institutions with novel ethical dilemmas. While frameworks and guidelines promise to align technology with moral and human values, the dilemma of how AI may impact existing valuing practices is often overlooked. To examine this gap, we conducted an interview study with university teachers from different disciplines at a university in Sweden. Following a semi-structured study design, we explored university teachers’ anticipations of AI in assessment and examined how emerging AI technologies may reconfigure the fit between values, challenges, and activities situated in everyday assessment contexts. Our findings suggest that anticipated AI, including automation and AI-mediated communication and grading, may amplify and reduce teachers’ possibilities to align activities with professional, pedagogical, and relational values and solve current challenges. In light of the study’s findings, the paper discusses potential ethical issues in the anticipated shifts from human to automated assessment and possible new and reinforced challenges brought by AI for education.

AI and EthicsVol. 5(3)
Stockholm University (SE)
Stockholms Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Situating AI in assessment—an exploration of university teachers’ valuing practices — Elin Sporrong, Teresa Cerratto Pargman, et al. · AI and Ethics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS