Should we stay or should we exit? Dilemmas faced by multinationals under sanctioned regimes

This study investigates how multinational enterprises (MNEs) navigate sanctioned regimes using the Myanmar context following a 2021 military coup. We find that without formal institutional pressures, MNEs exit voluntarily due to informal stakeholder pressures. However, such exits are often considered irresponsible as MNEs transfer assets to unethical buyers or the sanctioned regime, thus potentially worsening the human rights conditions. We provide eight propositions that define a responsible exit from a sanctioned regime. This study offers insights into the multifaceted nature of strategic exits thus articulating ethical dilemmas faced when exiting from foreign markets amid sanctions-induced challenges, real or perceived. This study proposes a framework outlining the interplay between formal and informal institutional pressures placed on MNEs in sanctioned regimes, thus theoretically contributing to the institution-based view by highlighting legitimacy concerns and reputational management strategies employed by MNEs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of World Business
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2024.101585
Citations
8
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Should we stay or should we exit? Dilemmas faced by multinationals under sanctioned regimes

Htwe Htwe Thein, Anton Klarin, Sergey Sosnovskikh, Anna Grosman
8 citations
Journal of World Business
International Development and Aid
11.21
article

Should we stay or should we exit? Dilemmas faced by multinationals under sanctioned regimes

Htwe Htwe Thein, Anton Klarin, Sergey Sosnovskikh, Anna Grosman
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This study investigates how multinational enterprises (MNEs) navigate sanctioned regimes using the Myanmar context following a 2021 military coup. We find that without formal institutional pressures, MNEs exit voluntarily due to informal stakeholder pressures. However, such exits are often considered irresponsible as MNEs transfer assets to unethical buyers or the sanctioned regime, thus potentially worsening the human rights conditions. We provide eight propositions that define a responsible exit from a sanctioned regime. This study offers insights into the multifaceted nature of strategic exits thus articulating ethical dilemmas faced when exiting from foreign markets amid sanctions-induced challenges, real or perceived. This study proposes a framework outlining the interplay between formal and informal institutional pressures placed on MNEs in sanctioned regimes, thus theoretically contributing to the institution-based view by highlighting legitimacy concerns and reputational management strategies employed by MNEs.

Journal of World BusinessVol. 59(6)
Australian Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
International Development and Aid
11.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.