Capturing Tail Risks in Cryptomarkets: A New Systemic Risk Approach

Using daily returns of Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ripple and Stellar, we introduce a novel risk measure for quantitative-risk management in the cryptomarket that accounts for the significant co-movements between cryptocurrencies. We find that our model has a lower error margin when forecasting the extent of future losses than traditional risk measures, such as Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall. Most notably, we observe this in Litecoin’s results, where Expected Shortfall, on average, overestimates the potential fall in the price of Litecoin by 8.61% and underestimates it by 3.92% more than our model. This research shows that traditional risk measures, while not necessarily inappropriate, are imperfect and incomplete representations of risk when it comes to the cryptomarket. Our model provides a suitable alternative for risk managers, who prioritize lower error margins over failure rates, and highlights the value in exploring how risk measures that incorporate the unique characteristics of cryptocurrencies can be used to supplement and complement traditional risk measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17090397
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capturing Tail Risks in Cryptomarkets: A New Systemic Risk Approach

Tomer Shushi, Elroi Hadad, Rami Yosef, Itai Barkai
7 citations
Journal of risk and financial management
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
5.45
article

Capturing Tail Risks in Cryptomarkets: A New Systemic Risk Approach

Tomer Shushi, Elroi Hadad, Rami Yosef, Itai Barkai
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Using daily returns of Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ripple and Stellar, we introduce a novel risk measure for quantitative-risk management in the cryptomarket that accounts for the significant co-movements between cryptocurrencies. We find that our model has a lower error margin when forecasting the extent of future losses than traditional risk measures, such as Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall. Most notably, we observe this in Litecoin’s results, where Expected Shortfall, on average, overestimates the potential fall in the price of Litecoin by 8.61% and underestimates it by 3.92% more than our model. This research shows that traditional risk measures, while not necessarily inappropriate, are imperfect and incomplete representations of risk when it comes to the cryptomarket. Our model provides a suitable alternative for risk managers, who prioritize lower error margins over failure rates, and highlights the value in exploring how risk measures that incorporate the unique characteristics of cryptocurrencies can be used to supplement and complement traditional risk measures.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 17(9)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Sami Shamoon College of Engineering (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
5.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.