Assessment of postmortem urine fentanyl detection by autopsy dipstick testing in accidental overdose deaths

Accidental overdose cases continue to rise due to the opioid epidemic in the USA, namely, the widespread availability and use of fentanyl. Medical examiners and coroners across the country have been subsequently burdened, and with limited resources, some seek alternative triaging processes to identify overdoses. Point-of-care urine dipstick testing at autopsy is one such idea that may be used in various ways to instigate or negate the need for an autopsy or regular forensic toxicology laboratory testing. This study investigated the frequency and estimated quantitative fentanyl and norfentanyl concentrations in the postmortem urine of fentanyl-related accidental overdose deaths, as well as the effectiveness of commercially available point-of-care urine dipstick tests based on such concentrations. A total of 1550 fentanyl-related accidental overdose cases, where both the postmortem peripheral femoral blood and urine were tested, were reviewed. Of these, using sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) laboratory testing, 82 cases (5%) had a positive fentanyl or norfentanyl detection in the blood, while fentanyl or norfentanyl remained undetected in the urine. Furthermore, a comparison of commercially available urine dipstick test cut-offs and authentic casework with estimated urine concentrations revealed that at a fentanyl/norfentanyl cut-off level of 5 ng/mL, 19% of these fentanyl-related accidental overdoses would result in a false negative, 24% at 10 ng/mL, 25% at 20 ng/mL, 51% at 50 ng/mL, and 61% at 100 ng/mL. The study found that the use of urine dipstick tests, as a decision-maker for the initiation of further comprehensive routine toxicology laboratory testing, or to support cause and manner of death determination, leads to both false-positive and false-negative predictions in fentanyl accidental overdoses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Analytical Toxicology
Published
2024-08-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae072
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of postmortem urine fentanyl detection by autopsy dipstick testing in accidental overdose deaths

Luke N. Rodda, Anson Tsang
4 citations
Journal of Analytical Toxicology
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
2.17
article

Assessment of postmortem urine fentanyl detection by autopsy dipstick testing in accidental overdose deaths

Luke N. Rodda, Anson Tsang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Accidental overdose cases continue to rise due to the opioid epidemic in the USA, namely, the widespread availability and use of fentanyl. Medical examiners and coroners across the country have been subsequently burdened, and with limited resources, some seek alternative triaging processes to identify overdoses. Point-of-care urine dipstick testing at autopsy is one such idea that may be used in various ways to instigate or negate the need for an autopsy or regular forensic toxicology laboratory testing. This study investigated the frequency and estimated quantitative fentanyl and norfentanyl concentrations in the postmortem urine of fentanyl-related accidental overdose deaths, as well as the effectiveness of commercially available point-of-care urine dipstick tests based on such concentrations. A total of 1550 fentanyl-related accidental overdose cases, where both the postmortem peripheral femoral blood and urine were tested, were reviewed. Of these, using sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) laboratory testing, 82 cases (5%) had a positive fentanyl or norfentanyl detection in the blood, while fentanyl or norfentanyl remained undetected in the urine. Furthermore, a comparison of commercially available urine dipstick test cut-offs and authentic casework with estimated urine concentrations revealed that at a fentanyl/norfentanyl cut-off level of 5 ng/mL, 19% of these fentanyl-related accidental overdoses would result in a false negative, 24% at 10 ng/mL, 25% at 20 ng/mL, 51% at 50 ng/mL, and 61% at 100 ng/mL. The study found that the use of urine dipstick tests, as a decision-maker for the initiation of further comprehensive routine toxicology laboratory testing, or to support cause and manner of death determination, leads to both false-positive and false-negative predictions in fentanyl accidental overdoses.

Journal of Analytical ToxicologyVol. 48(9)
Office of Chief Medical Examiner (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Berry (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.