Assessment of Sensitivity and Specificity of CEA in Primary Diagnosis of patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancy

Primary Diagnosis of GI (gastrointestinal) malignancy is difficult and most of the diagnostic tools were costly and invasive. The clinical validity of monitoring the serum biomarker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was assessed in 100 patients with gastric, duodenal and colorectal adenocarcinomas in a tertiary-level hospital in Bangladesh. Sensitivity and specificity of the test were evaluated preoperatively. Patients were assessed clinically, radiologically, and biochemically. Our study revealed that in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy as a whole the CEA test had a preoperative sensitivity and specificity of 54% and 80%, respectively. In stomach cancer, the sensitivity and specificity of CEA were 33.33% and 100%, respectively. In duodenal adenocarcinoma and carcinoma of caecum, the sensitivity and specificity of CEA were 66.67% and 40.0%, respectively. In colonic cancer, the sensitivity and specificity of CEA were 42.86% and 60.0%, respectively. In rectal carcinoma, the sensitivity and specificity of CEA were 42.86% and 63.64%, respectively. All these values are not statistically significant. So for detecting GI malignancies, the use of CEA is not widely recommended due to its low sensitivity and high specificity. An additional finding was that serum CEA levels were significantly elevated in advanced stages of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy, with the highest levels observed in stage D (100%) followed by stage C (92.3%) and stage B (32.3%). Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Med. Coll. J. 2024;3(2):70-73

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical College Journal
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmcj.v3i2.75927
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Sensitivity and Specificity of CEA in Primary Diagnosis of patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancy

Saiful Islam Khan, Ratan Kumar Saha, Md Shafiqul Islam, Mostak Ahmed et al.
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical College Journal
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Assessment of Sensitivity and Specificity of CEA in Primary Diagnosis of patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancy

Saiful Islam Khan, Ratan Kumar Saha, Md Shafiqul Islam, Mostak Ahmed, Md Sidur Rahman Mollah, ASM Tanjilur Rahman, Quazi Mehranuddin Ahmed, Md Tofazzal Hussain, S. Atique, Rifat Subrina Anna
article en

Abstract

Primary Diagnosis of GI (gastrointestinal) malignancy is difficult and most of the diagnostic tools were costly and invasive. The clinical validity of monitoring the serum biomarker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was assessed in 100 patients with gastric, duodenal and colorectal adenocarcinomas in a tertiary-level hospital in Bangladesh. Sensitivity and specificity of the test were evaluated preoperatively. Patients were assessed clinically, radiologically, and biochemically. Our study revealed that in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy as a whole the CEA test had a preoperative sensitivity and specificity of 54% and 80%, respectively. In stomach cancer, the sensitivity and specificity of CEA were 33.33% and 100%, respectively. In duodenal adenocarcinoma and carcinoma of caecum, the sensitivity and specificity of CEA were 66.67% and 40.0%, respectively. In colonic cancer, the sensitivity and specificity of CEA were 42.86% and 60.0%, respectively. In rectal carcinoma, the sensitivity and specificity of CEA were 42.86% and 63.64%, respectively. All these values are not statistically significant. So for detecting GI malignancies, the use of CEA is not widely recommended due to its low sensitivity and high specificity. An additional finding was that serum CEA levels were significantly elevated in advanced stages of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy, with the highest levels observed in stage D (100%) followed by stage C (92.3%) and stage B (32.3%). Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Med. Coll. J. 2024;3(2):70-73

Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical College JournalVol. 3(2)
Bangladesh Medical University (BD), Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.