Effect of Solutionization and Deformation on Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical/Electrical Properties of Al–Mg–Si Alloy with Er + Sc Co‐Addition

Effect of solutionization (two‐step vs one‐step solution treatment) and deformation (one‐step solutionization + deformation vs no deformation) on microstructural evolution and mechanical/electrical properties of an aged Al–Mg–Si alloy with microalloying Er + Sc co‐addition is studied, respectively, in comparison with its counterpart with a single Sc addition at the same total addition content. Experimental results showed that the Er + Sc co‐added Al–Mg–Si alloy displayed a combination of aging hardness and electrical conductivity superior to the single Sc‐added alloy, under either two‐step or one‐step solution treatment. This highlights an effective microalloying way to improve the Al–Mg–Si alloy by partially using cheap Er rather than full addition of expensive Sc. While the introduction of deformation yielded to a higher aging hardness but a lower electrical conductivity in the Er + Sc co‐added alloy apparently than in the single Sc‐added alloy. When comparing among the Er + Sc co‐added alloys, it is found that, although the one‐step solutionization leads to the highest aging hardness (≈102 HV in peak aging) and the deformation introduction results in the highest electrical conductivity (up to 57.3% IACS), the two‐step solutionization brought about the best combination of aging hardness (≈87 HV) and electrical conductivity (up to 56.7% IACS). Microstructural evolution under different treatments is analyzed to rationalize the variation in aging hardness and electrical conductivity especially in the Er + Sc co‐added Al–Mg–Si alloy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Materials
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202400847
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Solutionization and Deformation on Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical/Electrical Properties of Al–Mg–Si Alloy with Er + Sc Co‐Addition

R. H. Wang, B. A. Chen, Zhixiang Zhu, Shengyu Jiang et al.
4 citations
Advanced Engineering Materials
Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
5.20
article

Effect of Solutionization and Deformation on Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical/Electrical Properties of Al–Mg–Si Alloy with Er + Sc Co‐Addition

R. H. Wang, B. A. Chen, Zhixiang Zhu, Shengyu Jiang, Jianhua Dong, Yu Han, Menglin Li, Changlong Yang, Yiting Huang, Rui Chen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Effect of solutionization (two‐step vs one‐step solution treatment) and deformation (one‐step solutionization + deformation vs no deformation) on microstructural evolution and mechanical/electrical properties of an aged Al–Mg–Si alloy with microalloying Er + Sc co‐addition is studied, respectively, in comparison with its counterpart with a single Sc addition at the same total addition content. Experimental results showed that the Er + Sc co‐added Al–Mg–Si alloy displayed a combination of aging hardness and electrical conductivity superior to the single Sc‐added alloy, under either two‐step or one‐step solution treatment. This highlights an effective microalloying way to improve the Al–Mg–Si alloy by partially using cheap Er rather than full addition of expensive Sc. While the introduction of deformation yielded to a higher aging hardness but a lower electrical conductivity in the Er + Sc co‐added alloy apparently than in the single Sc‐added alloy. When comparing among the Er + Sc co‐added alloys, it is found that, although the one‐step solutionization leads to the highest aging hardness (≈102 HV in peak aging) and the deformation introduction results in the highest electrical conductivity (up to 57.3% IACS), the two‐step solutionization brought about the best combination of aging hardness (≈87 HV) and electrical conductivity (up to 56.7% IACS). Microstructural evolution under different treatments is analyzed to rationalize the variation in aging hardness and electrical conductivity especially in the Er + Sc co‐added Al–Mg–Si alloy.

Advanced Engineering MaterialsVol. 26(21)
State Grid Corporation of China (China) (CN), Xi’an University (CN), Shanghai Electric (China) (CN), Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, State Grid Corporation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
5.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.