Assessing the effect of multispecies interactions on precautionary reference points using an ensemble modelling approach: A North Sea case study

The precautionary approach to fisheries management requires accounting of uncertainty to ensure stock sustainability. Most fisheries management is based on a single-species approach, with stocks assumed independent of one another, even though it is known that stocks interact through predation and competition for resources. The strength of these interactions depends on the relative abundance and size/age composition of stocks, but they are usually treated as fixed. Therefore, a key question is: can we simultaneously adopt the precautionary approach for multiple stocks while accounting for these interactions? Here we examine the impact of stock interactions on calculations of precautionary reference points for nine stocks in the North Sea. We combined four multispecies models using an ensemble model to rigorously quantify uncertainty and explore the rates of fishing mortality that leads to groups of stocks being fished according to the precautionary approach. We found that relaxing the assumption of stock independence meant that no fishing at all was only precautionary for six of nine stocks, and no fishing strategy was precautionary for all nine. We suggest that it is necessary to account for multispecies interactions when calculating precautionary reference points.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fisheries Research
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107160
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the effect of multispecies interactions on precautionary reference points using an ensemble modelling approach: A North Sea case study

Nicola Walker, Robert B. Thorpe, Matthew R. Kerr, Paul J. Dolder et al.
5 citations
Fisheries Research
Marine and fisheries research
1.41
article

Assessing the effect of multispecies interactions on precautionary reference points using an ensemble modelling approach: A North Sea case study

Nicola Walker, Robert B. Thorpe, Matthew R. Kerr, Paul J. Dolder, Michael A. Spence, Peter Mitchell, Khatija Alliji, James A. Martindale, Hayley J. Bannister
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The precautionary approach to fisheries management requires accounting of uncertainty to ensure stock sustainability. Most fisheries management is based on a single-species approach, with stocks assumed independent of one another, even though it is known that stocks interact through predation and competition for resources. The strength of these interactions depends on the relative abundance and size/age composition of stocks, but they are usually treated as fixed. Therefore, a key question is: can we simultaneously adopt the precautionary approach for multiple stocks while accounting for these interactions? Here we examine the impact of stock interactions on calculations of precautionary reference points for nine stocks in the North Sea. We combined four multispecies models using an ensemble model to rigorously quantify uncertainty and explore the rates of fishing mortality that leads to groups of stocks being fished according to the precautionary approach. We found that relaxing the assumption of stock independence meant that no fishing at all was only precautionary for six of nine stocks, and no fishing strategy was precautionary for all nine. We suggest that it is necessary to account for multispecies interactions when calculating precautionary reference points.

Fisheries ResearchVol. 280
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB), Aarhus University (DK), Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (AU), Ecological Consulting (Czechia) (CZ)
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Marine and fisheries research
1.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.