The impact of initial tumor bulk in DLBCL treated with DA-EPOCH-R <i>vs.</i> R-CHOP: a secondary analysis of alliance/CALGB 50303

The ideal treatment paradigm for bulky diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains uncertain. We investigated the impact of tumor bulk in patients treated with systemic therapy alone through Alliance/CALGB 50303. Data from this trial were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's NCTN/NCORP Data Archive. The study assessed the size of nodal sites and estimated progression-free survival (PFS) using Cox proportional hazards models. Stratified analysis factored in International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk scores. Out of 524 patients, 155 had pretreatment scans. Using a 7.5 cm cutoff, 44% were classified as bulky. Bulk did not significantly impact progression-free survival (PFS), whether measured continuously or at thresholds of >5 or >7.5 cm (<i>p</i> = 0.10-<i>p</i> = 0.99). Stratified analyses by treatment group and IPI risk group were also non-significant. In this secondary analysis, a significant association between bulk and PFS was not identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2393753
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of initial tumor bulk in DLBCL treated with DA-EPOCH-R vs. R-CHOP: a secondary analysis of alliance/CALGB 50303

C.M. Lanier, Ralph B. D’Agostino, N. Razavian, Ryan T. Hughes et al.
1 citations
Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
0.42
article

The impact of initial tumor bulk in DLBCL treated with DA-EPOCH-R vs. R-CHOP: a secondary analysis of alliance/CALGB 50303

C.M. Lanier, Ralph B. D’Agostino, N. Razavian, Ryan T. Hughes, Sydney Smith
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The ideal treatment paradigm for bulky diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains uncertain. We investigated the impact of tumor bulk in patients treated with systemic therapy alone through Alliance/CALGB 50303. Data from this trial were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's NCTN/NCORP Data Archive. The study assessed the size of nodal sites and estimated progression-free survival (PFS) using Cox proportional hazards models. Stratified analysis factored in International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk scores. Out of 524 patients, 155 had pretreatment scans. Using a 7.5 cm cutoff, 44% were classified as bulky. Bulk did not significantly impact progression-free survival (PFS), whether measured continuously or at thresholds of >5 or >7.5 cm (<i>p</i> = 0.10-<i>p</i> = 0.99). Stratified analyses by treatment group and IPI risk group were also non-significant. In this secondary analysis, a significant association between bulk and PFS was not identified.

Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphomaVol. 65(14)
Wake Forest University (US)
American College of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.