Ideologies shaping university competition

This conceptual study explores the dominant ideologies influencing the economic governance of higher education (HE) and shaping competition within the sector and among universities. It delineates and contrasts four key ideological positions - neoliberalism, managerialism, shareholderism, and stakeholderism - and outlines four corresponding types of university competition: signaling, intraorganizational, interorganizational, and priority competition. The paper contributes to the discourse on university competition as a macro trend in HE by examining its ideological underpinnings. Notably, it observes that real-life outcomes often diverge from the idealized visions these ideologies promote. The study concludes by illustrating how these four types of competition coexist in HE and discussing how shifts in coordination or decision-making mechanisms can influence which ideology gains prominence in shaping competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Higher Education
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2397048
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ideologies shaping university competition

Kerttu Kettunen, Kimmo Alajoutsijärvi, Rómulo Pinheiro
8 citations
Studies in Higher Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
17.85
article

Ideologies shaping university competition

Kerttu Kettunen, Kimmo Alajoutsijärvi, Rómulo Pinheiro
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This conceptual study explores the dominant ideologies influencing the economic governance of higher education (HE) and shaping competition within the sector and among universities. It delineates and contrasts four key ideological positions - neoliberalism, managerialism, shareholderism, and stakeholderism - and outlines four corresponding types of university competition: signaling, intraorganizational, interorganizational, and priority competition. The paper contributes to the discourse on university competition as a macro trend in HE by examining its ideological underpinnings. Notably, it observes that real-life outcomes often diverge from the idealized visions these ideologies promote. The study concludes by illustrating how these four types of competition coexist in HE and discussing how shifts in coordination or decision-making mechanisms can influence which ideology gains prominence in shaping competition.

Studies in Higher EducationVol. 49(10)
University of Turku (FI), University of Agder (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Higher Education Governance and Development
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.