Choking off democratic channels and the resort to violence: how the political genocide of <i>Unión Patriótica</i> (UP) candidates escalated and perpetuated Colombia’s armed conflict

This paper asks how the political genocide of the Unión Patriótica (UP) affected the Colombian armed conflict in Colombia. We are specifically interested in how virtually removing its linked political party as a channel through which to engage in the democratic process led to more violence by the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia – Ejército del Pueblo (FARC-EP). Our theory is based on the proposition that the presence of stable democratic processes for airing grievances has a dampening effect on conflict. In addition to situating our argument in the literature, our theory and empirical tests are built on the historical context of the Colombian conflict, the creation of the UP, and the political genocide against that party. We use regression models to test our hypotheses that more killings of UP members will lead to more FARC-EP violence across municipalities in Colombia, and also to less democratic participation. The results provide support for our theory. We conclude by considering ways to further refine the empirical testing of the theory as well as with a consideration of how this paper may contribute to future peace processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Wars and Insurgencies
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2024.2393496
Primary Topic
Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Choking off democratic channels and the resort to violence: how the political genocide of Unión Patriótica (UP) candidates escalated and perpetuated Colombia’s armed conflict

Stacy Bondanella Taninchev, Kelsey Carlston, Jenaro Abraham
Small Wars and Insurgencies
Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
article

Choking off democratic channels and the resort to violence: how the political genocide of Unión Patriótica (UP) candidates escalated and perpetuated Colombia’s armed conflict

Stacy Bondanella Taninchev, Kelsey Carlston, Jenaro Abraham
article en

Abstract

This paper asks how the political genocide of the Unión Patriótica (UP) affected the Colombian armed conflict in Colombia. We are specifically interested in how virtually removing its linked political party as a channel through which to engage in the democratic process led to more violence by the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia – Ejército del Pueblo (FARC-EP). Our theory is based on the proposition that the presence of stable democratic processes for airing grievances has a dampening effect on conflict. In addition to situating our argument in the literature, our theory and empirical tests are built on the historical context of the Colombian conflict, the creation of the UP, and the political genocide against that party. We use regression models to test our hypotheses that more killings of UP members will lead to more FARC-EP violence across municipalities in Colombia, and also to less democratic participation. The results provide support for our theory. We conclude by considering ways to further refine the empirical testing of the theory as well as with a consideration of how this paper may contribute to future peace processes.

Small Wars and InsurgenciesVol. 36(1)
Gonzaga University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.