A country’s culture and reporting of sustainability practices in energy industries: does a corporate sustainability committee matter?

This study investigates the impact of the national culture on the reporting of sustainability practices. Likewise, it explores the moderating effect of sustainability committees within firms on the nexus between a country’s cultural and sustainability reporting. The study uses a sample over a decade (2010–2019) from 18 countries. It employs six well-established cultural dimensions: power distance, Individualism, Masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation, and Indulgence. These dimensions are aggregated to create a composite cultural index score for each country, reflecting the nuanced interplay of cultural attributes. The sustainability reporting score is based on a firm Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores. The results reveal that reporting sustainability practices is a positive function of our country’s cultural index score. This indicates that a firm dissimilates higher levels of sustainability information when it operates in a country with a higher power distance, lower Individualism, higher Masculinity, higher uncertainty avoidance, higher long-term orientation, and lower Indulgence and vice versa. Likewise, a sustainability committee moderates the relationship between the national culture and sustainability reporting, suggesting that a corporate sustainability committee can act as a mechanism for aligning and adapting sustainability reporting practices to the specific cultural context in which a firm operates. The results provide essential implications for firms and policymakers. Firms should be aware of how cultural values shape their sustainability reporting. Also, a specialized sustainability committee navigates cultural complexities and aligns initiatives with expectations. Moreover, Policymakers should consider cultural influences and develop guidelines that accommodate variations, leading to more effective sustainability reporting. This study contributes by examining environmentally sensitive industries (i.e., the energy industries), providing industry-specific analysis that deepens our understanding of how a country’s culture shapes the reporting of sustainability practices. Likewise, the study uses a holistic approach, exploring the multifaceted dimensions of the country’s culture and its consequences for reporting sustainability practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03536-x
Citations
48
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A country’s culture and reporting of sustainability practices in energy industries: does a corporate sustainability committee matter?

Khalil Nimer, Ahmed Bani‐Mustafa, Ahmed Hassanein
48 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
26.62
article

A country’s culture and reporting of sustainability practices in energy industries: does a corporate sustainability committee matter?

Khalil Nimer, Ahmed Bani‐Mustafa, Ahmed Hassanein
article en
48 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of the national culture on the reporting of sustainability practices. Likewise, it explores the moderating effect of sustainability committees within firms on the nexus between a country’s cultural and sustainability reporting. The study uses a sample over a decade (2010–2019) from 18 countries. It employs six well-established cultural dimensions: power distance, Individualism, Masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation, and Indulgence. These dimensions are aggregated to create a composite cultural index score for each country, reflecting the nuanced interplay of cultural attributes. The sustainability reporting score is based on a firm Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores. The results reveal that reporting sustainability practices is a positive function of our country’s cultural index score. This indicates that a firm dissimilates higher levels of sustainability information when it operates in a country with a higher power distance, lower Individualism, higher Masculinity, higher uncertainty avoidance, higher long-term orientation, and lower Indulgence and vice versa. Likewise, a sustainability committee moderates the relationship between the national culture and sustainability reporting, suggesting that a corporate sustainability committee can act as a mechanism for aligning and adapting sustainability reporting practices to the specific cultural context in which a firm operates. The results provide essential implications for firms and policymakers. Firms should be aware of how cultural values shape their sustainability reporting. Also, a specialized sustainability committee navigates cultural complexities and aligns initiatives with expectations. Moreover, Policymakers should consider cultural influences and develop guidelines that accommodate variations, leading to more effective sustainability reporting. This study contributes by examining environmentally sensitive industries (i.e., the energy industries), providing industry-specific analysis that deepens our understanding of how a country’s culture shapes the reporting of sustainability practices. Likewise, the study uses a holistic approach, exploring the multifaceted dimensions of the country’s culture and its consequences for reporting sustainability practices.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 11(1)
Mansoura University (EG), Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW), Australian University, Kuwait (KW)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
26.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.