Identifying barriers to installing above-ground rainwater tanks in urban households in Aotearoa New Zealand: a segmentation approach

Urbanisation poses numerous challenges to fresh water biodiversity, and installation of above-ground rainwater tanks on private properties is one important tool for addressing these challenges. In this paper, we used an online survey targeting a representative sample of 1291 urban residents to investigate their underlying capabilities, opportunities, and motivations for installation of above-ground rainwater tanks on their properties. Only 221 (17%) of the 1,291 respondents already had an above-ground rainwater tank installed on their property. By segmenting on behavioural variables, we found that those urban residents who currently did not have a water tank on their property were not homogeneous. We identified three audience segments, ‘Supportive’ (19%), ‘Receptive’ (59%) and ‘Reluctant’ (22%), each with their own unique driver and barrier combination to rainwater tank installation. Suitable leverage points and behaviour change tools (e.g. education, enablement, incentivisation) and message framing (environmental, community, or functional benefits) are identified for each segment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Water Journal
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062x.2024.2397786
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying barriers to installing above-ground rainwater tanks in urban households in Aotearoa New Zealand: a segmentation approach

Natasha Tassell-Matamua, Lynette J. McLeod, Donald W. Hine, Jane Kitson et al.
1 citations
Urban Water Journal
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
0.21
article

Identifying barriers to installing above-ground rainwater tanks in urban households in Aotearoa New Zealand: a segmentation approach

Natasha Tassell-Matamua, Lynette J. McLeod, Donald W. Hine, Jane Kitson, Zack Dorner, Taciano L. Milfont, Philip Brown
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Urbanisation poses numerous challenges to fresh water biodiversity, and installation of above-ground rainwater tanks on private properties is one important tool for addressing these challenges. In this paper, we used an online survey targeting a representative sample of 1291 urban residents to investigate their underlying capabilities, opportunities, and motivations for installation of above-ground rainwater tanks on their properties. Only 221 (17%) of the 1,291 respondents already had an above-ground rainwater tank installed on their property. By segmenting on behavioural variables, we found that those urban residents who currently did not have a water tank on their property were not homogeneous. We identified three audience segments, ‘Supportive’ (19%), ‘Receptive’ (59%) and ‘Reluctant’ (22%), each with their own unique driver and barrier combination to rainwater tank installation. Suitable leverage points and behaviour change tools (e.g. education, enablement, incentivisation) and message framing (environmental, community, or functional benefits) are identified for each segment.

Urban Water JournalVol. 21(8)
Ministry for the Environment (NZ), Lincoln University (NZ), University of Canterbury (NZ), Massey University (NZ), University of Waikato (NZ), Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ)
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.