Gender stereotypes in artificial intelligence within the accounting profession using large language models

This study investigates how artificial intelligence (AI) perpetuates gender stereotypes in the accounting profession. Through experiments employing large language models (LLMs), we scrutinize how these models assign gender labels to accounting job titles. Our findings reveal differing tendencies among LLMs, with one favouring male labels, another female labels, and a third showing a balanced approach. Statistical analyses indicate significant disparities in labelling patterns, and job titles classified as male are associated with higher salary ranges, suggesting gender-related bias in economic outcomes. This study reaffirms existing literature on gender stereotypes in LLMs and uncovers specific biases in the accounting context. It underscores the transfer of biases from the physical to the digital realm through LLMs and highlights broader implications across various sectors. We propose raising public awareness as a means to mitigate these biases, advocating for proactive measures over relying solely on human intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03660-8
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender stereotypes in artificial intelligence within the accounting profession using large language models

Kelvin Leong, Anna Sung
17 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
16.09
article

Gender stereotypes in artificial intelligence within the accounting profession using large language models

Kelvin Leong, Anna Sung
article en
17 citations

Abstract

This study investigates how artificial intelligence (AI) perpetuates gender stereotypes in the accounting profession. Through experiments employing large language models (LLMs), we scrutinize how these models assign gender labels to accounting job titles. Our findings reveal differing tendencies among LLMs, with one favouring male labels, another female labels, and a third showing a balanced approach. Statistical analyses indicate significant disparities in labelling patterns, and job titles classified as male are associated with higher salary ranges, suggesting gender-related bias in economic outcomes. This study reaffirms existing literature on gender stereotypes in LLMs and uncovers specific biases in the accounting context. It underscores the transfer of biases from the physical to the digital realm through LLMs and highlights broader implications across various sectors. We propose raising public awareness as a means to mitigate these biases, advocating for proactive measures over relying solely on human intervention.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 11(1)
University of Chester (GB)
University of Chester
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
16.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.