Whole-Body HER2 Heterogeneity Identified on HER2 PET in HER2-Negative, -Low, and -Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
Understanding which patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative or -low metastatic breast cancer (MBC) benefit from HER2-targeted strategies is urgently needed. We assessed the whole-body heterogeneity of HER2 expression on <sup>89</sup>Zr-trastuzumab PET (HER2 PET) and the diagnostic performance of HER2 PET in a large series of patients, including HER2-negative and -low MBC. <b>Methods:</b> In the IMPACT-MBC study, patients with newly diagnosed and nonrapidly progressive MBC of all subtypes were included. Metastasis HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.<sup>89</sup>Zr-trastuzumab uptake was quantified as SUV<sub>max</sub> and SUV<sub>mean</sub> HER2 immunohistochemistry was related to the quantitative <sup>89</sup>Zr-trastuzumab uptake of all metastases and corresponding biopsied metastasis, uptake heterogeneity, and qualitative scan evaluation. A prediction algorithm for HER2 immunohistochemistry positivity based on uptake was developed. <b>Results:</b> In 200 patients, <sup>89</sup>Zr-trastuzumab uptake was quantified in 5,163 metastases, including 186 biopsied metastases. With increasing HER2 immunohistochemistry status, uptake was higher (geometric mean SUV<sub>max</sub> of 7.0, 7.6, 7.3, and 17.4 for a HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 0, 1, 2, or 3+, respectively; <i>P</i> < 0.001). High uptake exceeding 14.6 (90th percentile) was observed in one third of patients with a HER2-negative or -low metastasis biopsy. The algorithm performed best when lesion site and size were incorporated (area under the curve, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.93). <b>Conclusion:</b> HER2 PET had good diagnostic performance in MBC, showing considerable whole-body HER2 heterogeneity and uptake above background in HER2-negative and -low MBC. This provides novel insights into HER2-negative and -low MBC compared with standard HER2 immunohistochemistry on a single biopsy.
Authors
- Daniëlle J. Vugts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7068-8152)
- Bert van der Vegt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2613-1506)
- Evelien J. M. Kuip (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9114-643X)
- Bertha Eisses (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9288-0353)
- Frederike Bensch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8648-0612)
- Agnes Jager (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7713-1450)
- Adrienne H. Brouwers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2698-1516)
- Jasper Emmering
- Gerben J.C. Zwezerijnen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9571-9362)
- C. Willemien Menke‐van der Houven van Oordt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5404-5883)
- Sjoerd G. Elias (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3903-4024)
- Carolina P. Schröder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7537-489X)
- Anne I.J. Arens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-5372)
- Jasper van Geel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9045-8274)
- Elisabeth G.E. de Vries
- Marjolijn N. Lub–de Hooge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5390-2791)
Institutions
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2024-09-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267636
- Citations
- 15
- Primary Topic
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.24
Funders
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Radboud Universiteit
- Erasmus Medisch Centrum
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
- Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum