Practical Applications of Russian DPP4 Inhibitor Gosogliptin in “Palitra” Large-Scale Observational Study

BACKGROUND: To date, the results of Metformin, Gosogliptin and combination thereof have not been studied on a large patient population with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), including comorbid patients, in real clinical settings in the Russian Federation. AIM: The aim is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, treatment adherence and satisfaction of patients with DM2 with the use of Metformin and Gosogliptin sugar-lowering drugs and combination thereof in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS : The nationwide PALITRA multicenter observational study was conducted among patients with DM2 who were prescribed therapy with Metformin or Gosogliptin or combination thereof in everyday clinical practice. Groups were formed according to the sugar-lowering drug administered; a total of 5741 patients aged 18 to 65 years with DM2 and a wide comorbidity profile participated. The observation period was 6 months. Body weight, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) level, glycemic parameters, and biochemical parameters (ALT, AST and plasma creatinine) were recorded initially and 3 and 6 months after the initiation of therapy with the study drugs. Adherence to therapy and patient and physician satisfaction with the treatment were assessed using Likert scale. RESULTS: HbA1c level decreased by 1.03% in the Metformin monotherapy group and by 0.95% in the Gosogliptin monotherapy and Metformin and Gosogliptin combination therapy groups by Week 24. By the end of the study, 49.6% of patients with DM2 reached the target HbA 1c level (<7.0%). The proportion of patients with HbA 1c level <7.0% was 61.0% in the Metformin group, 47.75% and 47.2% in the Gosogliptin and Metformin/Gosogliptin dual combination therapy groups, respectively. The incidence of hypoglycemic episodes was very low throughout the whole period of observation, during which body weight decreased slightly. High satisfaction of patients and physicians with DM2 treatment was shown. This was reflected by high Likert scale scores. CONCLUSION: It has been proved that Metformin, Gosogliptin and the combination of Metformin and Gosogliptin were highly effective and safe (low incidence of hypoglycemia and no effect on body weight), and patients and physicians had been satisfied with the sugar-lowering therapy in a sufficient number of Russian patients with DM2 and a wide comorbidity profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Mellitus
Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14341/dm13193
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical Applications of Russian DPP4 Inhibitor Gosogliptin in “Palitra” Large-Scale Observational Study

Elena V. Biryukova, М. В. Шестакова
1 citations
Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Treatment and Management
0.36
article

Practical Applications of Russian DPP4 Inhibitor Gosogliptin in “Palitra” Large-Scale Observational Study

Elena V. Biryukova, М. В. Шестакова
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, the results of Metformin, Gosogliptin and combination thereof have not been studied on a large patient population with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), including comorbid patients, in real clinical settings in the Russian Federation. AIM: The aim is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, treatment adherence and satisfaction of patients with DM2 with the use of Metformin and Gosogliptin sugar-lowering drugs and combination thereof in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS : The nationwide PALITRA multicenter observational study was conducted among patients with DM2 who were prescribed therapy with Metformin or Gosogliptin or combination thereof in everyday clinical practice. Groups were formed according to the sugar-lowering drug administered; a total of 5741 patients aged 18 to 65 years with DM2 and a wide comorbidity profile participated. The observation period was 6 months. Body weight, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) level, glycemic parameters, and biochemical parameters (ALT, AST and plasma creatinine) were recorded initially and 3 and 6 months after the initiation of therapy with the study drugs. Adherence to therapy and patient and physician satisfaction with the treatment were assessed using Likert scale. RESULTS: HbA1c level decreased by 1.03% in the Metformin monotherapy group and by 0.95% in the Gosogliptin monotherapy and Metformin and Gosogliptin combination therapy groups by Week 24. By the end of the study, 49.6% of patients with DM2 reached the target HbA 1c level (<7.0%). The proportion of patients with HbA 1c level <7.0% was 61.0% in the Metformin group, 47.75% and 47.2% in the Gosogliptin and Metformin/Gosogliptin dual combination therapy groups, respectively. The incidence of hypoglycemic episodes was very low throughout the whole period of observation, during which body weight decreased slightly. High satisfaction of patients and physicians with DM2 treatment was shown. This was reflected by high Likert scale scores. CONCLUSION: It has been proved that Metformin, Gosogliptin and the combination of Metformin and Gosogliptin were highly effective and safe (low incidence of hypoglycemia and no effect on body weight), and patients and physicians had been satisfied with the sugar-lowering therapy in a sufficient number of Russian patients with DM2 and a wide comorbidity profile.

Diabetes MellitusVol. 27(4)
Endocrinology Research Center (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.