Filament Disturbance and Fusion during Embedded 3D Printing of Silicones

Embedded 3D printing (EMB3D) is an additive manufacturing technique that enables complex fabrication of soft materials including tissues and silicones. In EMB3D, a nozzle writes continuous filaments into a support bath consisting of a yield stress fluid. Lack of fusion defects between filaments can occur because the nozzle pushes support fluid into existing filaments, preventing coalescence. Interfacial tension was previously proposed as a tool to drive interfilament fusion. However, interfacial tension can also drive rupture and shrinkage of printed filaments. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of interfacial tension as a tool to control defects in EMB3D. Using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based inks with varying amounts of fumed silica and surfactant, printed into Laponite in water supports, we evaluate the effect of rheology, interfacial tension, print speeds, and interfilament spacings on defects. We print pairs of parallel filaments at varying orientations in the bath and use digital image analysis to quantify shrinkage, rupture, fusion, and positioning defects. By comparing disturbed filaments to printed pairs of filaments, we disentangle the effects of nozzle movement and filament extrusion. Critically, we find that capillary instabilities and interfilament fusion scale with the balance between support rheology and interfacial tension. Less viscous supports and higher interfacial tensions lead to more shrinkage and rupture at all points in the printing process, from relaxation after writing, to disturbance of the line, to writing of a second line. It is necessary to overextrude material to achieve interfilament fusion, particularly at high support viscosities and low interfacial tensions. Finally, fusion quality varies with printing orientation, and writing neighboring filaments causes displacement of existing structures. As such, specialized slicers are needed for EMB3D that consider the tighter spacings and orientation-dependent spacings necessary to achieve precise control over printed shapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01014
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Filament Disturbance and Fusion during Embedded 3D Printing of Silicones

Leanne Friedrich, Jeremiah W. Woodcock
6 citations
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
1.22
article

Filament Disturbance and Fusion during Embedded 3D Printing of Silicones

Leanne Friedrich, Jeremiah W. Woodcock
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Embedded 3D printing (EMB3D) is an additive manufacturing technique that enables complex fabrication of soft materials including tissues and silicones. In EMB3D, a nozzle writes continuous filaments into a support bath consisting of a yield stress fluid. Lack of fusion defects between filaments can occur because the nozzle pushes support fluid into existing filaments, preventing coalescence. Interfacial tension was previously proposed as a tool to drive interfilament fusion. However, interfacial tension can also drive rupture and shrinkage of printed filaments. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of interfacial tension as a tool to control defects in EMB3D. Using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based inks with varying amounts of fumed silica and surfactant, printed into Laponite in water supports, we evaluate the effect of rheology, interfacial tension, print speeds, and interfilament spacings on defects. We print pairs of parallel filaments at varying orientations in the bath and use digital image analysis to quantify shrinkage, rupture, fusion, and positioning defects. By comparing disturbed filaments to printed pairs of filaments, we disentangle the effects of nozzle movement and filament extrusion. Critically, we find that capillary instabilities and interfilament fusion scale with the balance between support rheology and interfacial tension. Less viscous supports and higher interfacial tensions lead to more shrinkage and rupture at all points in the printing process, from relaxation after writing, to disturbance of the line, to writing of a second line. It is necessary to overextrude material to achieve interfilament fusion, particularly at high support viscosities and low interfacial tensions. Finally, fusion quality varies with printing orientation, and writing neighboring filaments causes displacement of existing structures. As such, specialized slicers are needed for EMB3D that consider the tighter spacings and orientation-dependent spacings necessary to achieve precise control over printed shapes.

ACS Biomaterials Science & EngineeringVol. 10(10)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), Material Measurement Laboratory (US)
Material Measurement Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
1.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.