Evaluating the Utility of<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in Cancer of Unknown Primary
Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) represents a heterogeneous group of metastatic tumors for which standardized diagnostic work-up fails to identify the primary site. We aimed to describe the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre experience with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in extracervical CUP with respect to detection of a primary site and its impact on management. A secondary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with and without a detected primary site. <b>Methods:</b> CUP patients treated between 2014 and 2020 were identified from medical oncology clinics and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT records. Information collated from electronic medical records included the suspected primary site and treatment details before and after <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. Clinicopathologic details and genomic analysis were used to determine the clinically suspected primary site and compared against 2 independent masked reads of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT images by nuclear medicine specialists to determine sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the rate of detection of the primary site. <b>Results:</b> We identified 147 patients, 65% of whom had undergone molecular profiling. The median age at diagnosis was 61 y (range, 20-84 y), and the median follow-up time was 74 mo (range, 26-83 mo). Eighty-two percent were classified as having an unfavorable CUP subtype as per international guidelines.<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a primary site detection rate of 41%, resulted in a change in management in 22%, and identified previously occult disease sites in 37%. Median OS was 16.8 mo for all patients and 104.7 and 12.1 mo for favorable and unfavorable CUP subtypes, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Median OS in CUP patients when using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT, clinicopathologic, and genomic information was 19.8 and 8.5 mo when a primary site was detected and not detected, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.016). Multivariable analysis of survival adjusted for age and sex remained significant for identification of a potential primary site (<i>P</i> < 0.001), a favorable CUP (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 1 or less (<i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT plays a complementary role in CUP diagnostic work-up and was able to determine the likely primary site in 41% of cases. OS is improved with primary site identification, demonstrating the value of access to diagnostic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for CUP patients.
Authors
- Tharani Sivakumaran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9738-1580)
- Hui‐Li Wong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-2107)
- Anthony Cardin
- Rodney J. Hicks (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0758-0824)
- Linda Mileshkin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6826-6014)
- Jason Callahan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8957-2560)
- Richard W. Tothill (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4522-1184)
Institutions
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2024-09-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267274
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.13