Assessment of the Difference Between General Practitioners and Specialists in Antibiotic Prescription for Emergency Patients

Background:Endodontic emergencies are one of the most common emergencies that dentists face during their career. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and assess the difference between general dentists and endodontists in managing endodontic emergency cases. Also, it highlights the risk of bacterial resistance due to an inappropriate antibiotic prescription. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted at King Abdul-Aziz University Dental Hospital, a self-administered survey was distributed to 521 dental patients. The response rate was 82.9% (432 out of 521). The survey, available in both paper and electronic formats, comprised 24 questions organized into three main sections: the first section collected demographic and medical history data, the second focused on the patients' dental history related to emergencies, and the third detailed the treatment received during emergencies and the methods employed. A Fisher's exact test was utilized to assess significant differences between general dental practitioners and endodontic specialists regarding their initial steps, reasons for treatment, swelling conditions, biting and chewing conditions, and final treatments. Data analysis involved simple descriptive statistics, including percentages, frequency distributions, pie charts, and bar graphs. Statistical significance was determined with a p-value set at ≤ 0.05. Results: The study revealed that decay was the most prevalent reason for endodontic treatment, with immediate treatment being the preferred choice among dentists. Despite the well-documented issue of endodontic treatment failure due to inadequate coronal sealing, the majority of general dentists performed root canal treatments followed by either temporary or permanent restorations. Additionally, the study found that general dentists prescribed antibiotics more frequently than endodontists. Conclusion: The study findings indicate the need to develop intervention programs targeting clinicians to enhance knowledge about prescribing antibiotics for endodontic emergencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South Eastern European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70135/seejph.vi.1101
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Difference Between General Practitioners and Specialists in Antibiotic Prescription for Emergency Patients

Omar Alkhattab, Faisal Alghamdi, Ayman Moaz Abulhamael, Saeed Mohammad Bahattab et al.
1 citations
South Eastern European Journal of Public Health
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
0.30
article

Assessment of the Difference Between General Practitioners and Specialists in Antibiotic Prescription for Emergency Patients

Omar Alkhattab, Faisal Alghamdi, Ayman Moaz Abulhamael, Saeed Mohammad Bahattab, Ayman Olian Alsubhi, Abdulaziz Bakhsh, Alaa Jameel Kabbarah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background:Endodontic emergencies are one of the most common emergencies that dentists face during their career. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and assess the difference between general dentists and endodontists in managing endodontic emergency cases. Also, it highlights the risk of bacterial resistance due to an inappropriate antibiotic prescription. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted at King Abdul-Aziz University Dental Hospital, a self-administered survey was distributed to 521 dental patients. The response rate was 82.9% (432 out of 521). The survey, available in both paper and electronic formats, comprised 24 questions organized into three main sections: the first section collected demographic and medical history data, the second focused on the patients' dental history related to emergencies, and the third detailed the treatment received during emergencies and the methods employed. A Fisher's exact test was utilized to assess significant differences between general dental practitioners and endodontic specialists regarding their initial steps, reasons for treatment, swelling conditions, biting and chewing conditions, and final treatments. Data analysis involved simple descriptive statistics, including percentages, frequency distributions, pie charts, and bar graphs. Statistical significance was determined with a p-value set at ≤ 0.05. Results: The study revealed that decay was the most prevalent reason for endodontic treatment, with immediate treatment being the preferred choice among dentists. Despite the well-documented issue of endodontic treatment failure due to inadequate coronal sealing, the majority of general dentists performed root canal treatments followed by either temporary or permanent restorations. Additionally, the study found that general dentists prescribed antibiotics more frequently than endodontists. Conclusion: The study findings indicate the need to develop intervention programs targeting clinicians to enhance knowledge about prescribing antibiotics for endodontic emergencies.

South Eastern European Journal of Public Health
King Abdulaziz University (SA), Umm al-Qura University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
0.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.