A note on “Simple graphical rules to assess selection bias in general-population and selected-sample treatment effects” by M. B. Mathur and I. Shpitser

This short note is a commentary on a 2024 article by Mathur and Shpitser in the Journal, with the aim to enlarge the class of graphs for which the conditional average treatment effect is nonparametrically identified, by allowing the outcome to be on the pathway between the treatment and the selection indicator. A first straightforward generalization is possible when (1) the outcome $Y$ is binary, and (2) the population prevalence of $Y$ is known a priori or can be made the object of a sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, identification of the effect is possible also for $Y$ having any nature, provided that a selection bias breaking node $V$ exists and the population prevalence of $V$ is known.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae337
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A note on “Simple graphical rules to assess selection bias in general-population and selected-sample treatment effects” by M. B. Mathur and I. Shpitser

Elena Stanghellini, Marco Doretti, Taiki Tezuka
American Journal of Epidemiology
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

A note on “Simple graphical rules to assess selection bias in general-population and selected-sample treatment effects” by M. B. Mathur and I. Shpitser

Elena Stanghellini, Marco Doretti, Taiki Tezuka
article en

Abstract

This short note is a commentary on a 2024 article by Mathur and Shpitser in the Journal, with the aim to enlarge the class of graphs for which the conditional average treatment effect is nonparametrically identified, by allowing the outcome to be on the pathway between the treatment and the selection indicator. A first straightforward generalization is possible when (1) the outcome $Y$ is binary, and (2) the population prevalence of $Y$ is known a priori or can be made the object of a sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, identification of the effect is possible also for $Y$ having any nature, provided that a selection bias breaking node $V$ exists and the population prevalence of $V$ is known.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(3)
Yokohama National University (JP), University of Perugia (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.