Deriving Expected Values of Model Parameters When Using Sum Scores in Simulation Research

There is increasing interest in using factor scores in structural equation models and there have been numerous methodological papers on the topic. Nevertheless, sum scores, which are computed from adding up item responses, continue to be ubiquitous in practice. It is therefore important to compare simulation results involving factor scores to those of sum scores so that applied researchers can understand the advantages. Yet, researchers do not often compare sum scores and factor scores in terms of bias, a common simulation outcome. A reason for this is that sum scores are on a different scale and it is unclear how to compare sum scores to other types of scores. The purpose of this paper is to provide guidance for methodological researchers who wish to conduct research on scoring how to compute bias for sum scores by obtaining the expected values of their model parameters under a sum score model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2024.2376330
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deriving Expected Values of Model Parameters When Using Sum Scores in Simulation Research

A. R. Georgeson
1 citations
Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
0.49
article

Deriving Expected Values of Model Parameters When Using Sum Scores in Simulation Research

A. R. Georgeson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is increasing interest in using factor scores in structural equation models and there have been numerous methodological papers on the topic. Nevertheless, sum scores, which are computed from adding up item responses, continue to be ubiquitous in practice. It is therefore important to compare simulation results involving factor scores to those of sum scores so that applied researchers can understand the advantages. Yet, researchers do not often compare sum scores and factor scores in terms of bias, a common simulation outcome. A reason for this is that sum scores are on a different scale and it is unclear how to compare sum scores to other types of scores. The purpose of this paper is to provide guidance for methodological researchers who wish to conduct research on scoring how to compute bias for sum scores by obtaining the expected values of their model parameters under a sum score model.

Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary JournalVol. 32(1)
Arizona State University (US)
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.