Safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with treatment-naive or relapsed / refractory mantle cell lymphoma: phase Ib trial

This multicenter, open-label, phase Ib study (ACE-LY-106) assessed the safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, bendamustine, and rituximab (ABR) in treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until disease progression or treatment discontinuation, bendamustine on days 1 and 2 of each cycle for up to 6 cycles, and rituximab on day 1 of each cycle for 6 cycles, continuing every other cycle from cycle 8 for 12 additional doses (TN cohort). Eighteen patients enrolled in the TN cohort and 20 in the R/R cohort. Median duration of exposure to acalabrutinib was 34.0 and 14.6 months in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively. No new safety risks were identified, and most adverse events (AE) were grades 1 or 2. Thirteen patients from the TN cohort (72.2%) and 17 patients from the R/R cohort (85.0%) reported grade 3-4 AE, most commonly neutropenia (TN: 38.9%; R/R: 50.0%). AE leading to death were pneumonitis (N=1, TN cohort), COVID-19, and cerebrospinal meningitis (N=1 each, R/R cohort). Overall response was 94.4% and 85.0% in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively; complete response rates were 77.8% and 70.0%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 47.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in the TN cohort. After a median follow-up of 20.4 months, median PFS was 28.6 months and OS was not reached in the R/R cohort. Results indicate that ABR was safe and efficacious, supporting further study in patients with TN MCL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Haematologica
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2023.284896
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with treatment-naive or relapsed / refractory mantle cell lymphoma: phase Ib trial

Don A. Stevens, Krish Patel, Tycel Phillips, Safaa Ramadan et al.
5 citations
Haematologica
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.27
article

Safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with treatment-naive or relapsed / refractory mantle cell lymphoma: phase Ib trial

Don A. Stevens, Krish Patel, Tycel Phillips, Safaa Ramadan, Tadeusz Robak, Stephen D. Smith, Michael L. Wang, Wojciech J. Jurczak, Chuan‐Chuan Wun, David Gallinson
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This multicenter, open-label, phase Ib study (ACE-LY-106) assessed the safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, bendamustine, and rituximab (ABR) in treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until disease progression or treatment discontinuation, bendamustine on days 1 and 2 of each cycle for up to 6 cycles, and rituximab on day 1 of each cycle for 6 cycles, continuing every other cycle from cycle 8 for 12 additional doses (TN cohort). Eighteen patients enrolled in the TN cohort and 20 in the R/R cohort. Median duration of exposure to acalabrutinib was 34.0 and 14.6 months in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively. No new safety risks were identified, and most adverse events (AE) were grades 1 or 2. Thirteen patients from the TN cohort (72.2%) and 17 patients from the R/R cohort (85.0%) reported grade 3-4 AE, most commonly neutropenia (TN: 38.9%; R/R: 50.0%). AE leading to death were pneumonitis (N=1, TN cohort), COVID-19, and cerebrospinal meningitis (N=1 each, R/R cohort). Overall response was 94.4% and 85.0% in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively; complete response rates were 77.8% and 70.0%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 47.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in the TN cohort. After a median follow-up of 20.4 months, median PFS was 28.6 months and OS was not reached in the R/R cohort. Results indicate that ABR was safe and efficacious, supporting further study in patients with TN MCL.

HaematologicaVol. 110(3)
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Washington (US), Norton Healthcare (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Summit Medical Group (United States) (US), Copernicus Memorial Hospital (PL), Michigan Cancer Research Consortium (US), National Institute of Oncology (HU), Medical University of Lodz (PL), AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Incyte, Coherus Biosciences, MorphoSys, Genentech, Ignyta
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.