The economic impacts of ecosystem disruptions: Costs from substituting biological pest control

Biodiversity loss is accelerating, yet we know little about how these ecosystem disruptions affect human well-being. Ecologists have documented both the importance of bats as natural predators of insects as well as their population declines after the emergence of a wildlife disease, resulting in a potential decline in biological pest control. In this work, I study how species interactions can extend beyond an ecosystem and affect agriculture and human health. I find that farmers compensated for bat decline by increasing their insecticide use by 31.1%. The compensatory increase in insecticide use by farmers adversely affected health-human infant mortality increased by 7.9% in the counties that experienced bat die-offs. These findings provide empirical validation to previous theoretical predictions about how ecosystem disruptions can have meaningful social costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg0344
Citations
109
Primary Topic
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
49.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The economic impacts of ecosystem disruptions: Costs from substituting biological pest control

Eyal Frank
109 citations
Science
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
49.56
article

The economic impacts of ecosystem disruptions: Costs from substituting biological pest control

Eyal Frank
article en
109 citations

Abstract

Biodiversity loss is accelerating, yet we know little about how these ecosystem disruptions affect human well-being. Ecologists have documented both the importance of bats as natural predators of insects as well as their population declines after the emergence of a wildlife disease, resulting in a potential decline in biological pest control. In this work, I study how species interactions can extend beyond an ecosystem and affect agriculture and human health. I find that farmers compensated for bat decline by increasing their insecticide use by 31.1%. The compensatory increase in insecticide use by farmers adversely affected health-human infant mortality increased by 7.9% in the counties that experienced bat die-offs. These findings provide empirical validation to previous theoretical predictions about how ecosystem disruptions can have meaningful social costs.

ScienceVol. 385(6713)
National Bureau of Economic Research (US), Economic Policy Institute (US), University of Chicago (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
49.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.