The impact of (social) anchors on Prospect Theory’s value function

Anchoring impacts risk-taking decisions. This paper provides experimental evidence (n = 744) that (social) anchors shift the Prospect Theory’s value function (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979; Tversky and Kahneman, 1992). We observe that extreme (social) anchors lead to shifts in the value function, indicating a change in risk-taking. Anchors that are in line with risk-averse (risk-seeking) behavior lead, relative to the baseline, to more risk-averse (risk-seeking) decisions. Our findings are similar for social and non-social environments. • We study the impact of (social) anchors on Prospect Theory’s value function. • Anchors lead to adjusted risk-taking. • Anchors in line with risk-averse (risk-seeking) behavior lead to more risk-averse (risk-seeking) decisions. • We find similar effects for social and for non-social anchors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance
Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2024.101916
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of (social) anchors on Prospect Theory’s value function

Matthias Pelster, David D. Loschelder, Sebastian Krull
2 citations
The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
1.05
article

The impact of (social) anchors on Prospect Theory’s value function

Matthias Pelster, David D. Loschelder, Sebastian Krull
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Anchoring impacts risk-taking decisions. This paper provides experimental evidence (n = 744) that (social) anchors shift the Prospect Theory’s value function (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979; Tversky and Kahneman, 1992). We observe that extreme (social) anchors lead to shifts in the value function, indicating a change in risk-taking. Anchors that are in line with risk-averse (risk-seeking) behavior lead, relative to the baseline, to more risk-averse (risk-seeking) decisions. Our findings are similar for social and non-social environments. • We study the impact of (social) anchors on Prospect Theory’s value function. • Anchors lead to adjusted risk-taking. • Anchors in line with risk-averse (risk-seeking) behavior lead to more risk-averse (risk-seeking) decisions. • We find similar effects for social and for non-social anchors.

The Quarterly Review of Economics and FinanceVol. 98
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.