Quantitative comparison of automated OCT and conventional FAF-based geographic atrophy measurements in the phase 3 OAKS/DERBY trials

With the approval of the first two substances for the treatment of geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a standardized monitoring of patients treated with complement inhibitors in clinical practice is needed. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides high-resolution access to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and neurosensory layers, such as the ellipsoid zone (EZ), which further enhances the understanding of disease progression and therapeutic effects in GA compared to conventional fundus autofluorescence (FAF). In addition, artificial intelligence-based methodology allows the identification and quantification of GA-related pathology on OCT in an objective and standardized manner. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate automated OCT monitoring for GA compared to reading center-based manual FAF measurements in the largest successful phase 3 clinical trial data of complement inhibitor therapy to date. Automated OCT analysis of RPE loss showed a high and consistent correlation to manual GA measurements on conventional FAF. EZ loss on OCT was generally larger than areas of RPE loss, supporting the hypothesis that EZ loss exceeds underlying RPE loss as a fundamental pathophysiology in GA progression. Automated OCT analysis is well suited to monitor disease progression in GA patients treated in clinical practice and clinical trials.