Returning Incidental Research Findings From <scp><sup>18</sup>F</scp>‐Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography to Participants: A Survey of Investigators From a Clinical Trial of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Although it is recommended that researchers report and manage incidental research findings, our data show differing views and uncertainties on what and how to return, and the extent of follow up needed to manage, incidental findings from whole body FDG PET/CT; this highlights the need for more specific and standardized guidance.
Authors
- Howard Andrews (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7726-0551)
- Katherine P. Liao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4797-3200)
- Joan M. Bathon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6811-8986)
- Daniel H. Solomon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8202-5428)
- Jon T. Giles (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8792-0402)
- Jane S. Kang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3490-3765)
Institutions
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Arthritis Care & Research
- Published
- 2024-09-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25424
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.85
Funders
- National Institutes of Health