Challenging Ring‐Current Models of the Carrington Storm

Abstract A detailed analysis is made of horizontal‐component geomagnetic‐disturbance data acquired at the Colaba observatory in India recording the Carrington magnetic storm of September 1859. Prior to attaining its maximum absolute value, disturbance at Colaba increased with an e ‐folding timescale of 0.46 hr (28 min). Following its maximum, absolute disturbance at Colaba decreased as a trend having an e ‐folding timescale of 0.31 hr (19 min). Both of these timescales are much shorter than those characterizing the drift period of ring‐current ions. Furthermore, over one 28‐min interval when absolute disturbance was increasing, the data indicate an absolute rate of change of ≥2,436 nT/hr. If this is representative of disturbance generated by a symmetric magnetospheric ring current, then, assuming a standard and widely used parameterization, an interplanetary electric field of ≥451 mV/m is indicated. An idealized and extreme solar‐wind dynamic pressure could, conceivably, reduce this bound on the interplanetary electric field to ≥202 mV/m. If the parameterization for electric‐field extrapolation is accurate, but the field strengths obtained are deemed implausible, then it can be concluded that the Colaba disturbance data were significantly affected by partial‐ring, field‐aligned, or ionospheric currents. The same conclusion is supported by the shortness of the e ‐folding timescales characterizing the Colaba data. Several prominent studies of the Carrington event need to be reconsidered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ja032541
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenging Ring‐Current Models of the Carrington Storm

К. Мурсула, Jeffrey J. Love
5 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
1.66
article

Challenging Ring‐Current Models of the Carrington Storm

К. Мурсула, Jeffrey J. Love
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract A detailed analysis is made of horizontal‐component geomagnetic‐disturbance data acquired at the Colaba observatory in India recording the Carrington magnetic storm of September 1859. Prior to attaining its maximum absolute value, disturbance at Colaba increased with an e ‐folding timescale of 0.46 hr (28 min). Following its maximum, absolute disturbance at Colaba decreased as a trend having an e ‐folding timescale of 0.31 hr (19 min). Both of these timescales are much shorter than those characterizing the drift period of ring‐current ions. Furthermore, over one 28‐min interval when absolute disturbance was increasing, the data indicate an absolute rate of change of ≥2,436 nT/hr. If this is representative of disturbance generated by a symmetric magnetospheric ring current, then, assuming a standard and widely used parameterization, an interplanetary electric field of ≥451 mV/m is indicated. An idealized and extreme solar‐wind dynamic pressure could, conceivably, reduce this bound on the interplanetary electric field to ≥202 mV/m. If the parameterization for electric‐field extrapolation is accurate, but the field strengths obtained are deemed implausible, then it can be concluded that the Colaba disturbance data were significantly affected by partial‐ring, field‐aligned, or ionospheric currents. The same conclusion is supported by the shortness of the e ‐folding timescales characterizing the Colaba data. Several prominent studies of the Carrington event need to be reconsidered.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 129(9)
United States Geological Survey (US), Geologic Hazards Science Center, University of Oulu (FI)
U.S. Geological Survey
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
1.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.