A study on rhetorical questions in Korean: From the view of Verum Focus

This paper explores Korean rhetorical questions through Verum Focus (VF), which emphasizes truth value at a proposition's polarity focus. Traditionally, these questions are treated as a strong assertions that update common ground and generate polarity-reversing implications. The study views rhetorical questions as VF-marked, responding to presupposed or contextually accommodated polar alternatives. It introduces a syntactic structure with a polarity functional head, deriving meaning via a negative identity function at the LF. The paper's contribution lies in its new VF-based analysis of Korean rhetorical questions, suggesting further cross-linguistic research for broader insights.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Language and Linguistics
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20865/202410501
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study on rhetorical questions in Korean: From the view of Verum Focus

Arum Kang
Language and Linguistics
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

A study on rhetorical questions in Korean: From the view of Verum Focus

Arum Kang
article en

Abstract

This paper explores Korean rhetorical questions through Verum Focus (VF), which emphasizes truth value at a proposition's polarity focus. Traditionally, these questions are treated as a strong assertions that update common ground and generate polarity-reversing implications. The study views rhetorical questions as VF-marked, responding to presupposed or contextually accommodated polar alternatives. It introduces a syntactic structure with a polarity functional head, deriving meaning via a negative identity function at the LF. The paper's contribution lies in its new VF-based analysis of Korean rhetorical questions, suggesting further cross-linguistic research for broader insights.

Language and LinguisticsVol. 105
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.