Permanent hemodialysis catheters inserted with traditional (blind) technique: 10 years experience

Aims: In this study, complications and patency rates of permanent hemodialysis catheters, all inserted with traditional (blind) techniques in our clinic, were evaluated. Methods: Between June 2012 and June 2022, with the traditional (blind) technique, 627 patients were inserted with permanent hemodialysis catheters. These 627 patients were included in this study. Demographic characteristics of the patients, catheter insertion location and techniques, reasons for removal, duration of use, and catheter-related complications were recorded. Results: Between June 2012 and June 2022, 720 permanent hemodialysis catheters were inserted into 627 patients in our clinic. 350 patients male, and 277 patients were female. The mean age was 45.35 ± 15.9 (16-82 years). 610 catheters were inserted into the right jugular vein (84.7%), 90 catheters were inserted (12.5%) into the right femoral vein, 11 catheters (1.52%) were inserted into the left femoral vein, and 9 catheters (1.25%) were inserted into the left jugular vein. The need for re-catheter insertion developed in 93 patients. The reasons for re-catheter insertion were infection in 20 patients, intracatheter thrombosis in 63 patients, catheter malposition in 5 patients, and other causes in 5 patients. Conclusion: The permanent hemodialysis catheter placement method depends on the clinician's experience. Complication rates for permanent hemodialysis catheters inserted with the traditional (blind) technique are similar to other methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kastamonu Medical Journal
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51271/kmj-0148
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Permanent hemodialysis catheters inserted with traditional (blind) technique: 10 years experience

Burak Tamteki̇n, Güler Gülsen Ersoy
Kastamonu Medical Journal
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Permanent hemodialysis catheters inserted with traditional (blind) technique: 10 years experience

Burak Tamteki̇n, Güler Gülsen Ersoy
article en

Abstract

Aims: In this study, complications and patency rates of permanent hemodialysis catheters, all inserted with traditional (blind) techniques in our clinic, were evaluated. Methods: Between June 2012 and June 2022, with the traditional (blind) technique, 627 patients were inserted with permanent hemodialysis catheters. These 627 patients were included in this study. Demographic characteristics of the patients, catheter insertion location and techniques, reasons for removal, duration of use, and catheter-related complications were recorded. Results: Between June 2012 and June 2022, 720 permanent hemodialysis catheters were inserted into 627 patients in our clinic. 350 patients male, and 277 patients were female. The mean age was 45.35 ± 15.9 (16-82 years). 610 catheters were inserted into the right jugular vein (84.7%), 90 catheters were inserted (12.5%) into the right femoral vein, 11 catheters (1.52%) were inserted into the left femoral vein, and 9 catheters (1.25%) were inserted into the left jugular vein. The need for re-catheter insertion developed in 93 patients. The reasons for re-catheter insertion were infection in 20 patients, intracatheter thrombosis in 63 patients, catheter malposition in 5 patients, and other causes in 5 patients. Conclusion: The permanent hemodialysis catheter placement method depends on the clinician's experience. Complication rates for permanent hemodialysis catheters inserted with the traditional (blind) technique are similar to other methods.

Kastamonu Medical JournalVol. 4(3)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.