Repurposing the Public BraTS Dataset for Postoperative Brain Tumour Treatment Response Monitoring

The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge has been a main driver of the development of deep learning (DL) algorithms and provides by far the largest publicly available expert-annotated brain tumour dataset but contains solely preoperative examinations. The aim of our study was to facilitate the use of the BraTS dataset for training DL brain tumour segmentation algorithms for a postoperative setting. To this end, we introduced an automatic conversion of the three-label BraTS annotation protocol to a two-label annotation protocol suitable for postoperative brain tumour segmentation. To assess the viability of the label conversion, we trained a DL algorithm using both the three-label and the two-label annotation protocols. We assessed the models pre- and postoperatively and compared the performance with a state-of-the-art DL method. The DL algorithm trained using the BraTS three-label annotation misclassified parts of 10 out of 41 fluid-filled resection cavities in 72 postoperative glioblastoma MRIs, whereas the two-label model showed no such inaccuracies. The tumour segmentation performance of the two-label model both pre- and postoperatively was comparable to that of a state-of-the-art algorithm for tumour volumes larger than 1 cm<sup>3</sup>. Our study enables using the BraTS dataset as a basis for the training of DL algorithms for postoperative tumour segmentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tomography
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography10090105
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repurposing the Public BraTS Dataset for Postoperative Brain Tumour Treatment Response Monitoring

Hans Skovgaard Poulsen, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Jonathan Frederik Carlsen, Adam E. Hansen et al.
4 citations
Tomography
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
0.99
article

Repurposing the Public BraTS Dataset for Postoperative Brain Tumour Treatment Response Monitoring

Hans Skovgaard Poulsen, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Jonathan Frederik Carlsen, Adam E. Hansen, Flemming Littrup Andersen, Claes Nøhr Ladefoged, P.J. Sørensen, Vibeke Andrée Larsen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge has been a main driver of the development of deep learning (DL) algorithms and provides by far the largest publicly available expert-annotated brain tumour dataset but contains solely preoperative examinations. The aim of our study was to facilitate the use of the BraTS dataset for training DL brain tumour segmentation algorithms for a postoperative setting. To this end, we introduced an automatic conversion of the three-label BraTS annotation protocol to a two-label annotation protocol suitable for postoperative brain tumour segmentation. To assess the viability of the label conversion, we trained a DL algorithm using both the three-label and the two-label annotation protocols. We assessed the models pre- and postoperatively and compared the performance with a state-of-the-art DL method. The DL algorithm trained using the BraTS three-label annotation misclassified parts of 10 out of 41 fluid-filled resection cavities in 72 postoperative glioblastoma MRIs, whereas the two-label model showed no such inaccuracies. The tumour segmentation performance of the two-label model both pre- and postoperatively was comparable to that of a state-of-the-art algorithm for tumour volumes larger than 1 cm<sup>3</sup>. Our study enables using the BraTS dataset as a basis for the training of DL algorithms for postoperative tumour segmentation.

TomographyVol. 10(9)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Kræftens Bekæmpelse
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
0.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.