The Sphericity Paradox and the Role of Hoop Stresses in Free Subduction on a Sphere

Abstract Oceanic plates are doubly curved spherical shells, which influences how they respond to loading during subduction. Here we study a viscous fluid model for gravity‐driven subduction of a shell comprising a spherical plate and an attached slab. The shell is 100–1,000 times more viscous than the upper mantle. We use the boundary‐element method to solve for the flow. Solutions of an axisymmetric model show that the effect of sphericity on the flexure of shells is greater for smaller shells that are more nearly flat (the “sphericity paradox”). Both axisymmetric and three‐dimensional models predict that the deviatoric membrane stress in the slab should be dominated by the longitudinal normal stress (hoop stress), which is typically about twice as large as the downdip stress and of opposite sign. Our models also predict that concave‐landward slabs can exhibit both compressive and tensile hoop stress depending on the depth, whereas the hoop stress in convex slabs is always compressive. We test these two predictions against slab shape and earthquake focal mechanism data from the Mariana subduction zone, assuming that the deviatoric stress in our flow models corresponds to that implied by centroid moment tensors. The magnitude of the hoop stress exceeds that of the downdip stress for about half the earthquakes surveyed, partially verifying our first prediction. Our second prediction is supported by the near‐absence of earthquakes under tensile hoop stress in the portion of the slab having convex geometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb029500
Citations
1
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sphericity Paradox and the Role of Hoop Stresses in Free Subduction on a Sphere

Alexander Chamolly, Stéphanie Chaillat, Neil M. Ribe, Yida Li et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
earthquake and tectonic studies
0.53
article

The Sphericity Paradox and the Role of Hoop Stresses in Free Subduction on a Sphere

Alexander Chamolly, Stéphanie Chaillat, Neil M. Ribe, Yida Li, Zhong‐Hai Li, Gianluca Gerardi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Oceanic plates are doubly curved spherical shells, which influences how they respond to loading during subduction. Here we study a viscous fluid model for gravity‐driven subduction of a shell comprising a spherical plate and an attached slab. The shell is 100–1,000 times more viscous than the upper mantle. We use the boundary‐element method to solve for the flow. Solutions of an axisymmetric model show that the effect of sphericity on the flexure of shells is greater for smaller shells that are more nearly flat (the “sphericity paradox”). Both axisymmetric and three‐dimensional models predict that the deviatoric membrane stress in the slab should be dominated by the longitudinal normal stress (hoop stress), which is typically about twice as large as the downdip stress and of opposite sign. Our models also predict that concave‐landward slabs can exhibit both compressive and tensile hoop stress depending on the depth, whereas the hoop stress in convex slabs is always compressive. We test these two predictions against slab shape and earthquake focal mechanism data from the Mariana subduction zone, assuming that the deviatoric stress in our flow models corresponds to that implied by centroid moment tensors. The magnitude of the hoop stress exceeds that of the downdip stress for about half the earthquakes surveyed, partially verifying our first prediction. Our second prediction is supported by the near‐absence of earthquakes under tensile hoop stress in the portion of the slab having convex geometry.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 129(9)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut Pasteur (FR), École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Centre de Géosciences (FR), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (FR)
Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
earthquake and tectonic studies
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.