Clinical and hematological factors predicting the effectiveness of ruxolitinib in primary and secondary myelofibrosis. Results of a prospective single-center study

Background. Currently, targeted therapy is the most promising for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF). Today, the results of many years of experience with the use of ruxolitinib, including outside randomized trials and the identification of predictors of its effectiveness are important.Aim. To evaluate the results of long-term ruxolitinib therapy in patients with primary and secondary MF resistant to standard treatment and compare the effectiveness of MF targeted therapy in patient groups depending on age, gender, clinical, laboratory and morphological parameters.Materials and methods. The prospective study included 206 patients (95 (46 %) men and 111 (54 %) women aged 18–84 (mean 64) years) with MF in the chronic phase who received ruxolitinib: 154 (75 %) with primary MF, 39 (19 %) – with post-polycythemic, 13 (6 %) – with post-thrombocythemic. The median duration of chronic myeloproliferative disease from diagnosisto prescription of ruxolitinib was 75 (1–432) months. According to DIPSS (Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System), 15 % of patients were classified as high risk, 35 % as intermediate-2, 33 % as intermediate-1, and 17 % as low-risk. 44 % of patients had MF3, 49 % – MF2, 7 % – MF1. 71 % of patients had JAK2 V617F mutation, 3 % – MPL, 19 % – CALR, and in 7 % triple negative status was detected.Results. The median duration of ruxolitinib therapy was 24 (1–116) months. Clinical and hematological response at 1 month: complete and partial response – 14 %, clinical improvement – 20 %, stabilization – 57 %; at 3 months – 21, 34, 36 %, at 1 year – 34, 21, 34 %, respectively. No response was obtained in 18 % of patients. The median allele burden of JAK2 V617F during observation decreased more than twice from the initial value in half of the patients. The median of progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of ruxolitinib therapy was 28 months, the median of overall survival (OS) has not been achieved. PFS at 1 year of treatment was 68 %, at 2 years – 56 %, at 3 years – 46 %, at 5 years – 32 %, OS – 87, 75, 68, and 54 %, respectively. Among many factors analyzed before starting ruxolitinib therapy, the following ones had statistically proofed significance for PFS: age, DIPSS risk level,therapy with hydroxycarbamide, interferon, white blood cell count, platelet count, hemoglobin level, and degree of fibrosis. For OS,the following factors were significantly important: age, risk level according to DIPSS,type of MF, interferon therapy, white blood cell count, platelet count, hemoglobin level, and degree of fibrosis.Conclusion. The long-term effectiveness of ruxolitinib therapy for primary and secondary MF has been demonstrated. Gender, age, clinical, laboratory, and morphological prognostic factors of ruxolitinib therapy efficiency in MF have been identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncohematology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2024-19-3-16-33
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and hematological factors predicting the effectiveness of ruxolitinib in primary and secondary myelofibrosis. Results of a prospective single-center study

Д. И. Шихбабаева, A. G. Popova, Olga Vinogradova, В. В. Птушкин et al.
1 citations
Oncohematology
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
0.44
article

Clinical and hematological factors predicting the effectiveness of ruxolitinib in primary and secondary myelofibrosis. Results of a prospective single-center study

Д. И. Шихбабаева, A. G. Popova, Olga Vinogradova, В. В. Птушкин, M. V. Chernikov, А. Л. Неверова, L. B. Egoryan, M. A. Murzabekova, В. П. Косенкова, M. M. Pankraskina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background. Currently, targeted therapy is the most promising for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF). Today, the results of many years of experience with the use of ruxolitinib, including outside randomized trials and the identification of predictors of its effectiveness are important.Aim. To evaluate the results of long-term ruxolitinib therapy in patients with primary and secondary MF resistant to standard treatment and compare the effectiveness of MF targeted therapy in patient groups depending on age, gender, clinical, laboratory and morphological parameters.Materials and methods. The prospective study included 206 patients (95 (46 %) men and 111 (54 %) women aged 18–84 (mean 64) years) with MF in the chronic phase who received ruxolitinib: 154 (75 %) with primary MF, 39 (19 %) – with post-polycythemic, 13 (6 %) – with post-thrombocythemic. The median duration of chronic myeloproliferative disease from diagnosisto prescription of ruxolitinib was 75 (1–432) months. According to DIPSS (Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System), 15 % of patients were classified as high risk, 35 % as intermediate-2, 33 % as intermediate-1, and 17 % as low-risk. 44 % of patients had MF3, 49 % – MF2, 7 % – MF1. 71 % of patients had JAK2 V617F mutation, 3 % – MPL, 19 % – CALR, and in 7 % triple negative status was detected.Results. The median duration of ruxolitinib therapy was 24 (1–116) months. Clinical and hematological response at 1 month: complete and partial response – 14 %, clinical improvement – 20 %, stabilization – 57 %; at 3 months – 21, 34, 36 %, at 1 year – 34, 21, 34 %, respectively. No response was obtained in 18 % of patients. The median allele burden of JAK2 V617F during observation decreased more than twice from the initial value in half of the patients. The median of progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of ruxolitinib therapy was 28 months, the median of overall survival (OS) has not been achieved. PFS at 1 year of treatment was 68 %, at 2 years – 56 %, at 3 years – 46 %, at 5 years – 32 %, OS – 87, 75, 68, and 54 %, respectively. Among many factors analyzed before starting ruxolitinib therapy, the following ones had statistically proofed significance for PFS: age, DIPSS risk level,therapy with hydroxycarbamide, interferon, white blood cell count, platelet count, hemoglobin level, and degree of fibrosis. For OS,the following factors were significantly important: age, risk level according to DIPSS,type of MF, interferon therapy, white blood cell count, platelet count, hemoglobin level, and degree of fibrosis.Conclusion. The long-term effectiveness of ruxolitinib therapy for primary and secondary MF has been demonstrated. Gender, age, clinical, laboratory, and morphological prognostic factors of ruxolitinib therapy efficiency in MF have been identified.

OncohematologyVol. 19(3)
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU), Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RU), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RU), Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
0.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.