Between Ifá’s complementary logic and Jaina perspectival pluralism

In spite of the gap in emergence, geography and independence in the practices of the religious aspects of each of Ifá and Jainism, there are some unique philosophical components in the principles guiding the modus operandi of these two traditions that command intellectual attention. This investigation is pertinent following the recent need to emphasise aspects of humanity that exhibit common grounds and mutual understanding that inform how African and Eastern philosophies have contributed to world intellectual heritage. In this study, attention is given to the logic inherent in the principles of “binary complementarity” and “perspectival pluralism” in Ifá and Jainism respectively. Through the methods of hermeneutical and comparative analyses, this research argues that these unrelated traditions exhibit some similarities concerning how they are able to reconcile seemingly opposed realities without contradiction, thereby birthing a basis for complementary reflection with a pluralistic attitude. What this points out, in the end, is that rationality is indeed universal and not peculiar to a group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ezumezu.
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4314/ezumezu.v1i1.4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Ifá’s complementary logic and Jaina perspectival pluralism

Emmanuel Ofuasia
1 citations
Ezumezu.
Indian and Buddhist Studies
8.39
article

Between Ifá’s complementary logic and Jaina perspectival pluralism

Emmanuel Ofuasia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In spite of the gap in emergence, geography and independence in the practices of the religious aspects of each of Ifá and Jainism, there are some unique philosophical components in the principles guiding the modus operandi of these two traditions that command intellectual attention. This investigation is pertinent following the recent need to emphasise aspects of humanity that exhibit common grounds and mutual understanding that inform how African and Eastern philosophies have contributed to world intellectual heritage. In this study, attention is given to the logic inherent in the principles of “binary complementarity” and “perspectival pluralism” in Ifá and Jainism respectively. Through the methods of hermeneutical and comparative analyses, this research argues that these unrelated traditions exhibit some similarities concerning how they are able to reconcile seemingly opposed realities without contradiction, thereby birthing a basis for complementary reflection with a pluralistic attitude. What this points out, in the end, is that rationality is indeed universal and not peculiar to a group.

Ezumezu.Vol. 1(1)
National Open University of Nigeria (NG), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
8.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.