Endoscopic Findings in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed Patients    with High AIMS 65 Score

Objective: To determine the frequency of endoscopic findings in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleed patients with high AIMS 65 score at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi. Study Design: Cross-Sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Gastroenterology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi Pakistan, from Jan to Dec 2020. Methodology: All 112 patients with history of melena, hematemesis and with high AIMS 65 Score >2 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. Gastroscopy was carried out, and findings and their frequency were noted, along with Forrest classes and esophagitis grading. Results: This study included 112 patients with hematemesis and melena. The patients mean age was 43.5±12.11 years, mean duration of hematemesis was 7.12±3.10 hours. Among endoscopic findings the duodenal ulcers were the most common (46.4%) followed by gastric ulcers (42%), Camron ulcers (6.1%), esophagitis (10.7%), Mallory Weise tears (13.4%) and Dieulafoy's lesions (5.4 %) Among the duodenal and gastric ulcers, Forrest class IIC was most common i.e. (38.5%) and (46.8%) respectively. LA Grading of esophagitis showing LA Grade A (28.6 %) and Grade B (28.6 %). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that patients with high AIMS 65 scores have duodenal ulcers as most common endoscopic finding, followed by gastric ulcers. Among duodenal and gastric ulcers, Forrest class IIC was the most common finding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i4.8725
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic Findings in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed Patients    with High AIMS 65 Score

Hamid Ali Kalwar, Shahid Karim, Ghulam Mujtaba, Muhammad Tanweer Khalid et al.
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Endoscopic Findings in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed Patients    with High AIMS 65 Score

Hamid Ali Kalwar, Shahid Karim, Ghulam Mujtaba, Muhammad Tanweer Khalid, Dheeraj Kumar, Shahid Majid
article en

Abstract

Objective: To determine the frequency of endoscopic findings in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleed patients with high AIMS 65 score at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi. Study Design: Cross-Sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Gastroenterology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi Pakistan, from Jan to Dec 2020. Methodology: All 112 patients with history of melena, hematemesis and with high AIMS 65 Score >2 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. Gastroscopy was carried out, and findings and their frequency were noted, along with Forrest classes and esophagitis grading. Results: This study included 112 patients with hematemesis and melena. The patients mean age was 43.5±12.11 years, mean duration of hematemesis was 7.12±3.10 hours. Among endoscopic findings the duodenal ulcers were the most common (46.4%) followed by gastric ulcers (42%), Camron ulcers (6.1%), esophagitis (10.7%), Mallory Weise tears (13.4%) and Dieulafoy's lesions (5.4 %) Among the duodenal and gastric ulcers, Forrest class IIC was most common i.e. (38.5%) and (46.8%) respectively. LA Grading of esophagitis showing LA Grade A (28.6 %) and Grade B (28.6 %). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that patients with high AIMS 65 scores have duodenal ulcers as most common endoscopic finding, followed by gastric ulcers. Among duodenal and gastric ulcers, Forrest class IIC was the most common finding.

Pakistan Armed Forces Medical JournalVol. 74(4)
Liaquat National Hospital (PK), Civil Hospital Karachi (PK), Indus Hospital (PK), Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology (PK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.