Challenges and Potentials in Evaluating Early-Stage Deep Technology

Deep technology, or ‘deep tech’, represents a class of technologies distinguished by their basis in scientific breakthroughs or significant engineering innovations. This paper investigates the challenges and potentials of the technical due diligence required to evaluate deep tech in its early stages of development. Traditional evaluation methodologies often fall short, particularly in these early stages. The focus of this research is to identify the specific challenges of evaluating deep tech and the potential that future evaluation methodologies could achieve. Using a qualitative research methodology, expert interviews were used to explore the requirements for identifying and analyzing the challenges and potentials for evaluating early-stage deep tech. The interviews include perspectives from both industry and academia, exploring the diverse challenges and methodological approaches relevant to technical evaluation in this area. The analysis identifies key elements and challenges that influence the due diligence process for early-stage deep tech. The findings of this research are instrumental in laying the basis for future development of a specialized framework for technology evaluation and the refinement of the technical due diligence process in sectors driven by innovation and sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/picmet64035.2024.10653380
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Potentials in Evaluating Early-Stage Deep Technology

Miha Podbreznik, Florian Degen, Achim Kampker
1 citations
Private Equity and Venture Capital
0.95
article

Challenges and Potentials in Evaluating Early-Stage Deep Technology

Miha Podbreznik, Florian Degen, Achim Kampker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Deep technology, or ‘deep tech’, represents a class of technologies distinguished by their basis in scientific breakthroughs or significant engineering innovations. This paper investigates the challenges and potentials of the technical due diligence required to evaluate deep tech in its early stages of development. Traditional evaluation methodologies often fall short, particularly in these early stages. The focus of this research is to identify the specific challenges of evaluating deep tech and the potential that future evaluation methodologies could achieve. Using a qualitative research methodology, expert interviews were used to explore the requirements for identifying and analyzing the challenges and potentials for evaluating early-stage deep tech. The interviews include perspectives from both industry and academia, exploring the diverse challenges and methodological approaches relevant to technical evaluation in this area. The analysis identifies key elements and challenges that influence the due diligence process for early-stage deep tech. The findings of this research are instrumental in laying the basis for future development of a specialized framework for technology evaluation and the refinement of the technical due diligence process in sectors driven by innovation and sustainability.

Fraunhofer Research Institution for Battery Cell Production (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Challenges and Potentials in Evaluating Early-Stage Deep Technology — Miha Podbreznik, Florian Degen, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS