Table-mounted Versus Self-retaining Retraction

There was no significant difference observed in long-term swallowing dysfunction between patients who underwent ACSS with self-retaining and table-mounted retractors, although the rate of dysphagia was lower with table-mounted retraction. In addition, the greater number of operated levels per case in the table-mounted group at a similar time suggests improved efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Published
2024-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000001689
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Table-mounted Versus Self-retaining Retraction

Vincent P. Federico, Nicholas Shepard, Michael T. Nolte, Athan G. Zavras et al.
Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Table-mounted Versus Self-retaining Retraction

Vincent P. Federico, Nicholas Shepard, Michael T. Nolte, Athan G. Zavras, Rajko S. Vucicevic, Arash J. Sayari, Matthew W. Colman
article en

Abstract

There was no significant difference observed in long-term swallowing dysfunction between patients who underwent ACSS with self-retaining and table-mounted retractors, although the rate of dysphagia was lower with table-mounted retraction. In addition, the greater number of operated levels per case in the table-mounted group at a similar time suggests improved efficiency.

Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine PublicationVol. 38(3)
Rush University Medical Center (US), Allegheny General Hospital (US), Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance (US), Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.